Preregistering qualitative research

@article{Haven2019PreregisteringQR,
  title={Preregistering qualitative research},
  author={Tamarinde Laura Haven and Leonie van Grootel},
  journal={Accountability in Research},
  year={2019},
  volume={26},
  pages={229-244}
}
The threat to reproducibility and awareness of current rates of research misbehavior sparked initiatives to better academic science. One initiative is preregistration of quantitative research. We investigate whether the preregistration format could also be used to boost the credibility of qualitative research. A crucial distinction underlying preregistration is that between prediction and postdiction. In qualitative research, data are used to decide which way interpretation should move forward… 
Study Preregistration: An Evaluation of a Method for Transparent Reporting
Study preregistration promotes transparency in scientific research by making a clear distinction between a priori and post hoc procedures or analyses. Management and applied psychology have not
Improving Evidence-Based Practice through Preregistration of Applied Research: Barriers and Recommendations.
TLDR
The current review considers the potential of preregistration to improve both the accessibility and credibility of applied research towards more rigorous evidence-based practice.
Making ERP research more transparent: Guidelines for preregistration.
TLDR
An overview of the problems associated with undisclosed analytic flexibility is presented, why and how EEG researchers would benefit from adopting preregistration are discussed, and guidelines and examples on how to preregister data preprocessing and analysis steps in typical ERP studies are provided.
An Agenda for Open Science in Communication
In the last 10 years, many canonical findings in the social sciences appear unreliable. This so-called “replication crisis” has spurred calls for open science practices, which aim to increase the
Transparency of CHI Research Artifacts: Results of a Self-Reported Survey
TLDR
Authors of CHI 2018-2019 papers are surveyed, asking if they share their papers' research materials and data, how they share them, and why they do not, showing that sharing is uncommon.
Quantity Over Quality? Reproducible Psychological Science from a Mixed Methods Perspective
A robust dialogue about the (un)reliability of psychological science findings has emerged in recent years. In response, metascience researchers have developed innovative tools to increase rigor,
Developing an open science ‘mindset’
  • M. Hagger
  • Health Psychology and Behavioral Medicine
  • 2021
ABSTRACT Background Identification of widespread biases present in reported research findings in many scientific disciplines, including psychology, such as failures to replicate and the likely
Precarious Times, Professional Tensions: The Ethics of Migration Research and the Drive for Scientific Accountability
How should migration scholars navigate tensions between our ethical responsibilities to research participants and growing “open science” calls for data transparency, replication, and accountability?
Preregistration in Single-Case Design Research
To draw informed conclusions from research studies, research consumers need full and accurate descriptions of study methods and procedures. Preregistration has been proposed as a means to clarify
Preregistration in diverse contexts: a preregistration template for the application of cognitive models
TLDR
This article attempts to bridge the gap between open science and mathematical psychology, focusing on the type of cognitive modelling that Crüwell et al. labelled model application, where researchers apply a cognitive model as a measurement tool to test hypotheses about parameters of the cognitive model.
...
1
2
3
4
5
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 24 REFERENCES
The preregistration revolution
TLDR
Widespread adoption of preregistration will increase distinctiveness between hypothesis generation and hypothesis testing and will improve the credibility of research findings.
Pre-analysis Plans Have Limited Upside, Especially Where Replications Are Feasible
TLDR
It is argued that enthusiasm for pre-analysis plans should be tempered for several reasons, and practical proposals for how to increase the incentives for researchers to carry out replications are offered.
Planes Pre-Análisis para la investigación cualitativa
TLDR
The development of Pre-analysis Plan-Qualitative (PAP-Q) aims to synthetize these advances into a guide for researchers, in order to improve transparency and better specify the role of induction in the construction of causal arguments.
Why Most Published Research Findings Are False
TLDR
Simulations show that for most study designs and settings, it is more likely for a research claim to be false than true.
Further exploration of dissemination bias in qualitative research required to facilitate assessment within qualitative evidence syntheses.
TLDR
Further exploration of dissemination bias in qualitative research is needed, including the extent of non-dissemination and related dissemination bias, and how to assess dissemination bias within qualitative evidence syntheses.
Qualitative Evidence Synthesis
Qualitative evidence synthesis, also known as qualitative systematic review, offers a vehicle for presenting patients’ attitudes, beliefs and feelings as originally captured by individual qualitative
Fishing, Commitment, and Communication: A Proposal for Comprehensive Nonbinding Research Registration
TLDR
It is demonstrated here that even with this level of advanced specification, the scope for fishing is considerable when there is latitude over selection of covariates, subgroups, and other elements of an analysis plan.
How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data
TLDR
Meta-regression showed that self reports surveys, surveys using the words “falsification” or “fabrication”, and mailed surveys yielded lower percentages of misconduct, and when these factors were controlled for, misconduct was reported more frequently by medical/pharmacological researchers than others.
A manifesto for reproducible science
TLDR
This work argues for the adoption of measures to optimize key elements of the scientific process: methods, reporting and dissemination, reproducibility, evaluation and incentives, in the hope that this will facilitate action toward improving the transparency, reproducible and efficiency of scientific research.
Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook
TLDR
This book presents a step-by-step guide to making the research results presented in reports, slideshows, posters, and data visualizations more interesting, and describes how coding initiates qualitative data analysis.
...
1
2
3
...