Preprint Déjà Vu

  title={Preprint D{\'e}j{\`a} Vu},
  author={Paul Ginsparg},
  journal={The EMBO Journal},
Twenty‐five years ago, in August 1991, I spent a couple of afternoons at Los Alamos National Laboratory writing some simple software that enabled a small group of physicists to share drafts of their articles via automated email transactions with a central repository. Within a few years, the site migrated to the nascent WorldWideWeb as, and experienced both expansion in coverage and heavy growth in usage that continues to this day. In 1998, I gave a talk to a group of biologists… Expand
Quantifying the Growth of Preprint Services Hosted by the Center for Open Science
Nine of the largest English language preprint services offered by the Center for Open Science (COS) and available through an Application Programming Interface are surveyed, indicating that all services are growing, but with submission rates below more mature services. Expand
Examining the citation and altmetric advantage of bioRxiv preprints
It is found that citation and altmetric counts are higher for articles that were deposited to bioRxiv than those that were not, and future work will aim to statistically quantify the effect of multiple confounding variables on this relationship. Expand
The prehistory of biology preprints: A forgotten experiment from the 1960s
  • M. Cobb
  • Biology, Medicine
  • PLoS biology
  • 2017
The rise and fall of the IEGs is charted and the parallels with the 1990s and the biomedical preprint movement of today are explored. Expand
Techniques in natural language processing, computational linguistics, and machine-learning are applied to investigate papers in hep-th and four related sections of the arXiv to show that the syntactic structure of the titles in different sub-fields of high energy and mathematical physics are sufficiently different that a neural network can perform a binary classification of formal versus phenomenological sections. Expand
Rise of the Rxivs: How Preprint Servers are Changing the Publishing Process
  • Matthew B Hoy
  • Medicine, Computer Science
  • Medical reference services quarterly
  • 2020
A brief history of article preprints and their use in different scientific disciplines is provided and the advantages of and problems with preprints are discussed. Expand
Preprints and preprint servers as academic communication tools
The concept, development, advantages and limitations of preprints and preprint servers are analyzed, attending to their main function as publicly available repositories of manuscripts on the way to getting published. Expand
The effect of bioRxiv preprints on citations and altmetrics
It is found that bioRxiv-Deposited journal articles received a sizeable citation and altmetric advantage over non-deposited articles, and this advantage is not explained by multiple explanatory variables related to the article and its authorship. Expand
Author preprint behaviour and non‐compliance with journal preprint policies: One biomedical journal's experience
Insight into author use of preprints and compliance with policy furthers understanding of author utilization of preprint, informs future author education efforts, and supports attempts to harmonize licensing. Expand
Ten myths around open scholarly publishing
The changing world of scholarly communication and the emergence of ‘Open Science’ or ‘Open Research’ has brought to light a number of controversial and hotly-debated topics. Yet, evidence-basedExpand
The relationship between bioRxiv preprints, citations and altmetrics
It is found that bioRxiv-deposited journal articles had sizably higher citation and altmetric counts compared to nondeposited articles, and this advantage is not explained by multiple explanatory variables related to the articles’ publication venues and authorship. Expand


Positional effects on citation and readership in arXiv
A surprising correlation between article position in initial announcements, ordered by submission time, and later citation impact is confirmed and a variety of readership features with long-term citations are correlated, using machine learning methods, thereby extending previous results on the predictive power of early readership in a broader context. Expand
Accelerating scientific publication in biology
  • Ronald D Vale
  • Biology, Computer Science
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • 2015
The analysis suggests that publication practices have changed considerably in the life sciences over the past 30 years, and the average time required for graduate students to publish their first paper has increased and is approaching the desirable duration of PhD training. Expand
Priority of discovery in the life sciences
The advantages of separating these steps into disclosure via a preprint, and validation via a combination of peer review at a journal and additional evaluation by the wider scientific community are discussed. Expand
Patterns of text reuse in a scientific corpus
This first comprehensive study of patterns of text reuse within the full texts of an important large scientific corpus, covering a 20-y timeframe, infer a baseline for accepted practice, perhaps surprisingly permissive compared with other societal contexts, and a clearly delineated set of aberrant authors. Expand
A note concerning primary source knowledge
It is concluded that not even the arXiv filters, which are otherwise successful in filtering fringe‐topic papers, can fully acquire “Domain‐Specific Discrimination” and thus distinguish technical papers that are taken seriously by an expert community from those that are not. Expand
ArXiv rejections lead to spat over screening process
High-profile physicist says his students' papers were wrongly rejected by the preprint server's volunteer moderators.
Point of view: priority of discovery in the life sciences. eLife 5: e16931 ª
  • The Author The EMBO Journal
  • 2016
Copy is here:̃ ginsparg/physics/blurb/beagle99.html
  • Some comments on e-biosci. BioMedNet Magazine
  • 1999
Some comments on e - biosci
  • BioMedNet Magazine
  • 1999