Preposition stranding and ellipsis alternation 1

@article{Nykiel2016PrepositionSA,
  title={Preposition stranding and ellipsis alternation 1},
  author={J. Nykiel},
  journal={English Language and Linguistics},
  year={2016},
  volume={21},
  pages={27 - 45}
}
  • J. Nykiel
  • Published 18 February 2016
  • Linguistics
  • English Language and Linguistics
Ellipsis alternation refers here to the alternation between two kinds of ellipsis remnants whose correlates are prepositional phrases. One kind of remnant includes the preposition hosted by its correlate and the other doesn't. This alternation is now known to be cross-linguistically widespread although it was originally assumed to be banned in languages without preposition stranding under wh-movement. I argue that there is a nonsyntactic relationship between ellipsis alternation and preposition… 

Fragments and structural identity on a direct interpretation approach

TLDR
It is argued that structural identity constraints on fragments and their correlates should, where appropriate, make reference to the argument structure of lexical heads in the antecedent clauses.

English fragments, Minimize Domains, and Minimize Forms

TLDR
An account of preposition drop under clausal ellipsis in terms of two language processing principles: Minimize Domains and Minimize Forms is offered and proposed as an explanation for the typologically unusual preference that English shows for NP fragments.

Resumption as a sluicing source in Saudi Arabic: Evidence from sluicing with prepositional phrases

This paper reports the results of three acceptability judgment experiments on Saudi Arabic elliptical questions (sluicing) with prepositional phrases. We show that in standard cases of merger type

Fragment Answers in Korean and English: A Direct Interpretation Approach

Such fragments raise the question of how to account for the semantically propositional character of apparently nonsentential structures (Ginzburg & Sag 2000, Merchant 2004, Culicover & Jackendoff

Right Peripheral Fragments

In recent years, a number of authors (De Vries 2009, Truckenbrodt 2015, Ott and de Vries 2016, inter alia) have defended that right dislocations (RD) should be treated as bisentential structures,

On “sluicing” with apparent massive pied-piping

  • K. Abels
  • Linguistics
    Natural Language & Linguistic Theory
  • 2018
TLDR
This paper provides the first detailed description of a type of elliptical wh-question first noted in a footnote in Ross’s seminal paper on sluicing, and provides a defense of wh-move-and-delete approaches to sluices by removing Ross's nagging counterexample to the generalization that only wh-movable constituents can be sluice remnants.

Relative Clauses

Prologue 1. Background 2. Resumptive relatives 3. Prepositional relatives 4. Gapless relatives Epilogue.

Cultural Anthropology

  • Abstracts in Anthropology
  • 2019
Cultural Anthropology Applied anthropology, Social Policy 0751. Koch, B., Slate, J.R., & Moore, G.W. (2016). Advanced placement English exam scores: A comparison of scores for Hispanic students from

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 82 REFERENCES

The ellipsis alternation: remnants with and without prepositions

The ellipsis alternation refers here to the previously unexplored variation between two kinds of ellipsis remnants whose correlates are PPs. One kind of remnant includes the preposition hosted by its

Constraints on ellipsis alternation: A view from the history of English

TLDR
A diachronic perspective on EnglishEllipsis alternation, or the alternation between inclusion and omission of prepositions from remnants under sluicing and bare argument ellipsis, is offered, demonstrating that three constraints—correlate informativity, structural persistence, and construction type—predict ellipsi alternation in Early and Late Modern English.

Clefts and preposition omission under sluicing

Parallelism in Amis Sluicing

This paper argues that the view from stricter synta ctic parallelism fails to explain why sluicing in Amis can tolerate morphological and structural mismatches caused by argument structure

Fragments and ellipsis

TLDR
Fragmentary utterances such as ‘short’ answers and subsentential XPs without linguistic antecedents are proposed to have fully sentential syntactic structures, subject to ellipsis, and these structures shed light on the nature of islands.

Cleaving the Interactions Between Sluicing and Preposition Stranding

TLDR
It is claimed that, despite initial appearances, Spanish and BP do not constitute counterexamples to Merchant’s generalization, and there are two sources of sluicing in Romance: wh-movement plus IP-deletion and clefting plus IP deletion, the latter being the underlying source for P-stranding sluice.

Verb phrase ellipsis: The view from information structure

An analysis of antecedent mismatch effects under ellipsis is proposed to explain why some cases of verb phrase ellipsis exhibit a sizeable penalty when the elided target is not structurally matched

Ellipsis in split questions

TLDR
This article provides detailed argumentation that the tag involves movement of a correlate of the wh-phrase, followed by ellipsis of the remnant, thus contributing to the growing body of evidence that sentence fragments (sluicing, fragment answers, etc.) are syntactically full clauses.

Ellipsis and discourse coherence

TLDR
Five experiments testing predictions of the coherence theory raise questions about the empirical basis for coherence Theory because a syntactically-matching antecedent is preferred for all coherence relations, not just resemblance relations.

Voice and Ellipsis

TLDR
The VPellipsis facts fall into place if the head that determines voice is external to the phrase being elided, here argued to be vP; such an account can only be framed in approaches that allow syntactic features to be separated from the heads on which they are morphologically realized.
...