Prenatal diagnosis and discrimination against the disabled.

@article{Gillam1999PrenatalDA,
  title={Prenatal diagnosis and discrimination against the disabled.},
  author={Lynn Gillam},
  journal={Journal of medical ethics},
  year={1999},
  volume={25 2},
  pages={163-71}
}
Two versions of the argument that prenatal diagnosis discriminates against the disabled are distinguished and analysed. Both are shown to be inadequate, but some valid concerns about the social effects of prenatal diagnosis are highlighted. 
Related Discussions
This paper has been referenced on Twitter 2 times. VIEW TWEETS

References

Publications referenced by this paper.
Showing 1-10 of 10 references

Disability rights perspectives on reproductive technologies and public policy . See reference 8 : 241 - 247 , at 246 . 23 This distinction is emphasised by Buchanan Healthy genes in a healthy body

D Kaplan
World Health • 1998

Women with disabilities : abortion and liberation

A Davis
Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics • 1997

Women wait longer for babies as fertility falls

C Borthwick
The Age • 1995

The prevention of disablement

J McKie
Ethical issues in prenatal diagnosis and the termination of pregnancy • 1994

Does prenatal diagnosis discriminate against the disabled ?

H Houghton
1987

Can aborting " imperfect " children be immoral ?

A Asch
-1

Critical reflections on disability difference and genetic testing

C Newell
-1

Similar Papers

Loading similar papers…