Preliminary evidence of impaired thinking in sick patients.


BACKGROUND Earlier anecdotal observations suggested to us that certain aspects of judgment in sick adults approximate the thinking of children. OBJECTIVE To describe changes in judgment associated with serious illness in otherwise competent adults. DESIGN Cohort study. SETTING Urban acute-care hospital and senior citizen center. PARTICIPANTS Sicker (Karnofsky score </= 50; n = 24) and less sick (Karnofsky score > 50; n = 39) hospitalized patients were compared with controls (n = 28). Normal performance on the Mini-Mental State Examination (score >/= 24) was required for study entrance. MEASUREMENTS Seven Piagetian tasks of judgment designed to study childhood cognitive development. Degree of sickness was determined by using the Karnofsky scale of physical function. RESULTS Patients with Karnofsky scores of 50 or less responded correctly to fewer Piagetian tasks than controls (mean [+/-SD], 1.8 +/- 2.6 vs. 5.9 +/- 1.6; P < 0.001). Furthermore, a smaller proportion of sicker patients responded correctly to each of the seven tasks. Patients with Karnofsky scores greater than 50 did not perform differently than controls. CONCLUSION In sicker hospitalized patients, performance on seven Piagetian tasks of judgment was similar to that among children younger than 10 years of age. This evidence of cognitive impairment warrants further investigation.

Citations per Year

313 Citations

Semantic Scholar estimates that this publication has 313 citations based on the available data.

See our FAQ for additional information.

Cite this paper

@article{Cassell2001PreliminaryEO, title={Preliminary evidence of impaired thinking in sick patients.}, author={Eric J. Cassell and Andrew C. Leon and Stephen G. Kaufman}, journal={Annals of internal medicine}, year={2001}, volume={134 12}, pages={1120-3} }