• Corpus ID: 15590238

Preferring the Mighty to the Meek: Toddlers Prefer Novel Dominant Agents

  title={Preferring the Mighty to the Meek: Toddlers Prefer Novel Dominant Agents},
  author={Ashley J. Thomas and Meline Abramyan and Angela F. Lukowski and Lotte Thomsen and Barbara W. Sarnecka},
Every human society includes social hierarchies-- relationships between individuals and groups of unequal rank or status. Recent research has shown that even preverbal infants represent hierarchical relationships, expecting larger agents and agents from larger groups to win dominance contests. However, to successfully navigate social hierarchies, infants must also integrate information about social rank into their own behavior, such as when deciding which individuals to approach and which to… 
4 Citations
Social Behavior: Bonobos Are Nice but Prefer Mean Guys
  • J. Hamlin
  • Psychology, Economics
    Current Biology
  • 2018
An Integrative Developmental Framework for Studying Gender Inequities in Politics
Abstract Gender inequities in politics persist around the world. Research in political science and social psychology underscores how gender gaps in politics are fueled by societal messages that
Raisonnement et Argumentation : une approche interculturelle et développementale
Dans le domaine des sciences cognitives, la plupart des etudes sur la communication humaine se sont interessees a la maniere dont on comprend la communication et non pas a la maniere dont on


Big and Mighty: Preverbal Infants Mentally Represent Social Dominance
The results suggest that preverbal infants mentally represent social dominance and use a cue that covaries with it phylogenetically, and marks it metaphorically across human cultures and languages, to predict which of two agents is likely to prevail in a conflict of goals.
Infants use relative numerical group size to infer social dominance
It is shown that infants as young as 6 mo of age are capable of detecting dominance relations when provided with an ecologically relevant cue such as social group size, and infants can infer the social dominance relationship between two competing individuals based on the size of the group to which they belong, and expect individuals from a numerically larger group to get their way.
Representation of stable social dominance relations by human infants
Infants’ demonstrated understanding of social dominance reflects the cognitive underpinning of humans’ capacity to represent social relations, which may be evolutionarily ancient, and may be shared with nonhuman species.
Transitive inference of social dominance by human infants.
It is suggested that transitive inference may be supported by phylogenetically ancient mechanisms of ordinal representation and visuospatial processing that come online early in human development.
Male bonnet macaques use information about third-party rank relationships to recruit allies
  • J. Silk
  • Psychology
    Animal Behaviour
  • 1999
It is shown that male bonnet macaques, Macaca radiata, use information about third-party rank relationships when they recruit support from other males, and consistently chose allies that outranked themselves and their opponents.
Not So Innocent
It is found that toddlers can use the time and effort associated with goal-directed actions to distinguish agents, and that children prefer agents who incur fewer costs in completing a goal.
Social Evaluation by Preverbal Infants
It is indicated that even very young infants evaluate individuals based on their behavior toward others: infants prefer those who help others to those who hinder them.
How infants and toddlers react to antisocial others
Although adults generally prefer helpful behaviors and those who perform them, there are situations (in particular, when the target of an action is disliked) in which overt antisocial acts are seen
The evolution of prestige: freely conferred deference as a mechanism for enhancing the benefits of cultural transmission.
  • J. Henrich, F. Gil-White
  • Psychology
    Evolution and human behavior : official journal of the Human Behavior and Evolution Society
  • 2001