Predictive coding and representationalism


According to the predictive coding theory of cognition (PCT), brains are predictivemachines that use perception and action tominimize prediction error, i.e. the discrepancy between bottom–up, externally-generated sensory signals and top–down, internally-generated sensory predictions. Many consider PCT to have an explanatory scope that is unparalleled in contemporary cognitive science and see in it a framework that could potentially provide us with a unified account of cognition. It is also commonly assumed that PCT is a representational theory of sorts, in the sense that it postulates that our cognitive contact with the world is mediated by internal representations. However, the exact sense in which PCT is representational remains unclear; neither is it clear that it deserves such status—that is, whether it really invokes structures that are truly and nontrivially representational in nature. In the present article, I argue that the representational pretensions of PCT are completely justified. This is because the theory postulates cognitive structures—namely action-guiding, detachable, structural models that afford representational error detection—that play genuinely representational functions within the cognitive system.

DOI: 10.1007/s11229-015-0762-9

Cite this paper

@article{Gladziejewski2016PredictiveCA, title={Predictive coding and representationalism}, author={Pawel Gladziejewski}, journal={Synthese}, year={2016}, volume={193}, pages={559-582} }