Predatory publishing in management research: A call for open peer review

  title={Predatory publishing in management research: A call for open peer review},
  author={Leonhard Dobusch and Maximilian Heimst{\"a}dt},
  journal={Management Learning},
  pages={607 - 619}
Predatory journals have emerged as an unintended consequence of the Open Access paradigm. Predatory journals only supposedly or very superficially conduct peer review and accept manuscripts within days to skim off publication fees. In this provocation piece, we first explain how predatory journals exploit deficiencies of the traditional peer review process in times of Open Access publishing. We then explain two ways in which predatory journals may harm the management discipline: as an… 

Figures and Tables from this paper

Predatory journals as threats to the academic publishing: a review
Academic publishing has been increasing greatly with the spread of open access journals and the shift to online publishing. However, authors must be aware of predatory journals and publishers while
Citation contagion: a citation analysis of selected predatory marketing journals
The conventional marketing literature has been already contaminated by predatory marketing journals, according to the extent of citations of articles published in 10 predatory marketing Journals examined.
Publishing at Any Cost? The Need for the Improvement of the Quality of Scholarly Publications
At a time of great dynamism among publishers of scientific publications, with the inevitability of Open Access and the ease of publishing online at low cost, it is possible to find publications with
Power, Powerlessness, and Journal Ranking Lists: The Marginalization of Fields of Practice
This essay contributes a new perspective to debates about journal ranking lists and their effects on the practice of scholarship. Our argument is grounded in practice theory and draws on Bourdieu’s
The Open Innovation in Science research field: a collaborative conceptualisation approach
ABSTRACT Openness and collaboration in scientific research are attracting increasing attention from scholars and practitioners alike. However, a common understanding of these phenomena is hindered by
Challenges for the Academic Editor in the Scientific Publication
This perspective paper aims to add to the discussion of the (re)formulation of the academic editor’s role, considering that he or she, in this panoply of changes, continues, and will continue to be, the ultimate guardian of the scientific quality of what is published.
Critical essay: Blinding faith – Paradoxes and pathologies of opacity in peer review
The standing and progress of science depends upon confidence in the evaluation of knowledge claims. This essay affirms the value of peer review as a ‘gold standard’ but argues that its efficacy for...
A Revisão por Pares Aberta é abordada por diversos autores e tem sido crescente a sua adoção como um aspecto do movimento da Ciência Aberta nos últimos anos. Dessa forma, este estudo objetiva


‘Predatory’ open access: a longitudinal study of article volumes and market characteristics
Despite a total number of journals and publishing volumes comparable to respectable open access journals, the problem of predatory open access seems highly contained to just a few countries, where the academic evaluation practices strongly favor international publication, but without further quality checks.
Predatory and fake scientific journals/publishers: A global outbreak with rising trend: A review
In recent times some publishers are intensively exploiting the model of open access publishing. During the last several years, studies have shown that there was a substantial increase in the number
Predatory journals exploit structural weaknesses in scholarly publishing
The scholarly publishing process—from initial submission to final publication—has many weak points subject to exploitation [1]. Some open-access publishers have taken advantage of these
Predatory journals and their article publishing charges
A comprehensive assessment of the dynamics of open access journal publishing beyond author charges should be done to avoid using APCs alone as a measure of whether a journal is predatory or not.
Penetrating the Omerta of Predatory Publishing: The Romanian Connection
The paper presents the evidence in detail and uses it to analyze the publishing practices of the offending journal, using established criteria for assessing predatory publications, and warns the whole community of the long lasting damage when journals with low publishing ethics are taken seriously.
Open Evaluation: A Vision for Entirely Transparent Post-Publication Peer Review and Rating for Science
An OE system, in which papers are evaluated post-publication in an ongoing fashion by means of open peer review and rating, is proposed, which has the power to revolutionize scientific publishing and usher in a new culture of transparency, constructive criticism, and collaboration.
Emerging trends in peer review—a survey
Two major trends are identified: the rapidly expanding role of preprint servers that dispense with traditional peer review altogether, and the growth of “non-selective review,” focusing on papers' scientific quality rather than their perceived importance and novelty.
Disseminating Knowledge: From Potential to Reality—New Open-Access Journals Collide With Convention
Scholars beware! For years, researchers have lamented the long lag times endemic in conventional academic publishing, where even the highest quality papers have often taken more than two years from
The Long Goodbye: Can Academic Citizenship Sustain Academic Scholarship?
As journal editors, we actively manage the blind peer review process for the Journal of Management Education (JME), a top-tier publication within the scholarship of teaching and learning (SoTL) in
What is open peer review? A systematic review
A pragmatic definition of open peer review is proposed as an umbrella term for a number of overlapping ways that peer review models can be adapted in line with the aims of Open Science, including making reviewer and author identities open, publishing review reports and enabling greater participation in the peer review process.