Predatory journals: no definition, no defence

@article{Grudniewicz2019PredatoryJN,
  title={Predatory journals: no definition, no defence},
  author={Agnes Grudniewicz and D. Moher and K. Cobey and G. Bryson and S. Cukier and K. Allen and Clare Ardern and Lesley Balcom and Tiago Barros and M. Berger and Jairo Buitrago Ciro and L. Cugusi and M. Donaldson and M. Egger and Ian D. Graham and M. Hodgkinson and K. Khan and M. Mabizela and A. Manca and Katrin Milzow and J. Mouton and M. Muchenje and Tom Olijhoek and Alexander K. Ommaya and B. Patwardhan and D. Poff and L. Proulx and Mark Rodger and A. Severin and Michaela Strinzel and M. Sylos-Labini and R. Tamblyn and M. van Niekerk and J. Wicherts and M. Lalu},
  journal={Nature},
  year={2019},
  volume={576},
  pages={210 - 212}
}
Leading scholars and publishers from ten countries have agreed a definition of predatory publishing that can protect scholarship. It took 12 hours of discussion, 18 questions and 3 rounds to reach. Leading scholars and publishers from ten countries have agreed a definition of predatory publishing that can protect scholarship. It took 12 hours of discussion, 18 questions and 3 rounds to reach. 
64 Citations

Topics from this paper

Supporting a definition of predatory publishing
Is intentional publishing in predatory journals a form of scientific misconduct
  • PDF
Demarcating spectrums of predatory publishing: Economic and institutional sources of academic legitimacy
  • Kyle Siler
  • Political Science, Computer Science
  • J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol.
  • 2020
  • 8
Predatory journals: A sign of an unhealthy publish or perish game?
  • 3
Predatory journals: a different pandemic
  • PDF
An Alert to COVID-19 Literature in Predatory Publishing Venues
  • 15
...
1
2
3
4
5
...