Precedential Ad Hominem in Polemical Exchange: Examples from the Israeli Political Debate

@article{Orkibi2018PrecedentialAH,
  title={Precedential Ad Hominem in Polemical Exchange: Examples from the Israeli Political Debate},
  author={Eithan Orkibi},
  journal={Argumentation},
  year={2018},
  volume={32},
  pages={485-499}
}
AbstractThis article explores the modalities by which referring to past discursive performance of adversaries within a continuous polemical exchange is used in ad hominem attacks. Our starting point holds that in the context of lengthy debates, participants and third-party listeners share a rhetorical memory, which, dynamic and subjective as it may be, allows for the evaluation of participants’ characters based on their perceived discursive performances. By analysing opinion articles related to… 
2 Citations

‘It’s a war on Israel’s liberal democracy’: the Israeli left as a moral panic community, 2015-19

ABSTRACT This article examines the discourse of the Israeli Left in the years preceding the succession of general elections in 2019–21, with a focus on claims of the purported threats to democracy

Auto-victimisation et discours politique : émotions, résonance culturelle et mobilisation dans la rhétorique de B. Netanyahou

  • Eithan Orkibi
  • Political Science
    Argumentation et analyse du discours
  • 2019
Cette contribution explore la rhetorique d’auto-victimisation dans le discours politique. Si la « victimisation » est le processus par le biais duquel un individu ou un groupe sont culturellement

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 23 REFERENCES

Perelman, ad Hominem Argument, and Rhetorical Ethos

Perelman’s view of the role of persons in argument is one of the most distinctive features of his break with Cartesian assumptions about reasoning. Whereas the rationalist paradigm sought to minimize

The (Un)Reasonableness of Ad Hominem Fallacies

Starting from a pragmadialectical concept of reasonableness, the judgments of ordinary arguers concerning the reasonableness of discussion moves were investigated, concentrating on argumentum ad

Attacking Character: Ad Hominem Argument and Virtue Epistemology

The recent literature on ad hominem argument contends that the speaker’s character is sometimes relevant to evaluating what she says. This effort to redeem ad hominems requires an analysis of

Ethos at the Crossroads of Disciplines: Rhetoric, Pragmatics, Sociology

Examining the rhetorical notion of ethos at the crossroads of disciplines, this article builds up an integrated model attempting to reconcile Bourdieu's theory of language and power with pragmatic

Competitive Framing Processes in the Abortion Debate: Polarization-vilification, Frame Saving, and Frame Debunking

This article investigates how frame alignment processes are employed by a social movement organization in competitive response to a countermovement, focusing exclusively on the ideological clash around abortion.

Strategies of Character Attack

Why are personal attacks so powerful? In political debates, speeches, discussions and campaigns, negative character judgments, aggressive charges and charged epithets are used for different purposes.

Argumentation in Discourse: A Socio-discursive Approach to Arguments

Rather than the art of putting forward logically valid arguments leading to Truth, argumentation is here viewed as the use of verbal means ensuring an agreement on what can be considered reasonable

Non-Inferential Aspects of Ad Hominem and Ad Baculum

The aim of the paper is to explore the interrelation between persuasion tactics and properties of speech acts. We investigate two types of arguments ad: ad hominem and ad baculum. We show that with

Relevance reviewed: The case of argumentum ad hominem

This article aims tt providing some conceptual tools for dealing adequately with relevance in argumentative discourse. For this purpose, argumentative relevance is defined as a functional

Vilification and Social Movements: A Case Study of Pro-Life and Pro-Choice Rhetoric.

Vilification is a rhetorical strategy that discredits adversaries as ungenuine and malevolent advocates. The strategy is pervasive in the rhetoric of pro‐life and pro‐choice movements in Minnesota