Precarious Manhood and Its Links to Action and Aggression

@article{Bosson2011PrecariousMA,
  title={Precarious Manhood and Its Links to Action and Aggression},
  author={Jennifer K. Bosson and Joseph A. Vandello},
  journal={Current Directions in Psychological Science},
  year={2011},
  volume={20},
  pages={82 - 86}
}
Unlike womanhood, manhood is widely viewed as a status that is elusive (it must be earned) and tenuous (it must be demonstrated repeatedly through actions). This focus on the structure—rather than the content—of gender roles can shed new light on men’s use of action and physical aggression. Here, we review theory and research connecting manhood, action, and aggression. We interpret men’s aggression and aggressive displays as behaviors that effectively demonstrate manhood and thus quell men’s… 

Figures from this paper

Precarious Manhood and Its Effects on Aggression: The Role of Cultural Script

TLDR
It was found that the male participants believed that other male physical aggression that threatened their manhood was induced by situational factors rather than the internal characteristics of the attacker.

Hard won and easily lost: A review and synthesis of theory and research on precarious manhood.

This article reviews evidence that manhood is seen as a precarious social status that is both difficult to achieve and tenuously held. Compared with womanhood, which is typically viewed as resulting

Eastwood's Brawn and Einstein's Brain: An Evolutionary Account of Dominance, Prestige, and Precarious Manhood

Researchers have theorized that manhood is a precarious social status that requires effort to achieve. Because of this, men whose manhood is threatened react with a variety of compensatory behaviors

The political significance of fragile masculinity

How Do Men Construct and Explain Men’s Violence?

TLDR
Findings indicated that men’s construction of violence and their justifications for engaging in violence were linked to their constructions of masculinity and what it meant to them to be a man.

Feminism and the Study of Masculinity: Unlikely Bedfellows?

Studying the male gender role poses some unique challenges for feminist researchers. In this chapter, I use my personal experiences as a feminist and social psychologist to frame three key questions

Male Pattern Blindness: The Consequences of Defending Manhood

Research on threats to masculine gender identity reveals that they occur in a diversity of contexts. In conjunction with research on the content of masculine identity, there is converging evidence

Men, masculinity, and breakups: Resisting the tyranny of “moving on”

This article examines heterosexual men’s experience of negotiating through hegemonic masculinity after a partner-initiated breakup. The men in the study learned to navigate the relational demands of

Protecting Manhood: Race, Class, and Masculinity in Men’s Attraction to Guns and Aggression

Using an original self-report survey of 18- to 30-year-old men, this study aims to understand gendered processes underlying men’s attitudes toward guns and aggressive behavior through two types of

Precarious Manhood Predicts Support for Aggressive Policies and Politicians

TLDR
It is proposed that men’s concern about failing to meet masculine standards leads them to embrace policies and politicians that signal strength and toughness—or what the authors term political aggression.
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 20 REFERENCES

Precarious Manhood and Displays of Physical Aggression

TLDR
The results of three experiments demonstrate that physically aggressive displays are part of men's cultural script for restoring threatened gender status and suggest that aggressive displays may function to downregulate negative affect when manhood has been threatened.

Precarious manhood.

TLDR
The authors report 5 studies that demonstrate that manhood, in contrast to womanhood, is seen as a precarious state requiring continual social proof and validation, and argue that men feel especially threatened by challenges to their masculinity.

The Proof is in the Punch: Gender Differences in Perceptions of Action and Aggression as Components of Manhood

Two studies test the hypotheses that men, relative to women: 1) see manhood as a more elusive, impermanent state than womanhood, and 2) understand aggression as a means of proving or re-establishing

Human aggression.

TLDR
Using the general aggression model (GAM), this review posits cognition, affect, and arousal to mediate the effects of situational and personological variables on aggression.

Male honor and female fidelity: implicit cultural scripts that perpetuate domestic violence.

TLDR
Three general predictions were supported: (a) female infidelity damages a man's reputation, particularly in honor cultures; (b) this reputation can be partially restored through the use of violence; and (c) women in honor culture are expected to remain loyal in the face of jealousy-related violence.

A cross-cultural analysis of the behavior of women and men: implications for the origins of sex differences.

TLDR
The cross-cultural evidence on the behavior of women and men in nonindustrial societies, especially the activities that contribute to the sex-typed division of labor and patriarchy, is reviewed.

Insult, aggression, and the southern culture of honor: an "experimental ethnography".

TLDR
Findings highlight the insult-aggression cycle in cultures of honor, in which insults diminish a man's reputation and he tries to restore his status by aggressive or violent behavior.

Stand by Your Man

Cultural values emphasizing female loyalty, sacrifice, and male honor may indirectly sanction relationship violence and reward women who remain in abusive relationships. Two studies compare

Measuring sex stereotypes : a thirty-nation study

A study of gender roles in thirty countries from Peru to Malaysia, which tests the perceptions of both children and adults. The authors uncover an array of ideas about gender and sex roles that are

Formidability and the logic of human anger

TLDR
The fact that stronger men favored greater use of military force in international conflicts provides evidence that the internal logic of the anger program reflects the ancestral payoffs characteristic of a small-scale social world rather than rational assessments of modern payoffs in large populations.