Pragmatism vs interpretivism in qualitative information systems research

@article{Goldkuhl2012PragmatismVI,
  title={Pragmatism vs interpretivism in qualitative information systems research},
  author={G{\"o}ran Goldkuhl},
  journal={EJIS},
  year={2012},
  volume={21},
  pages={135-146}
}
Qualitative research is often associated with interpretivism, but alternatives do exist. Besides critical research and sometimes positivism, qualitative research in information systems can be performed following a paradigm of pragmatism. This paradigm is associated with action, intervention and constructive knowledge. This paper has picked out interpretivism and pragmatism as two possible and important research paradigms for qualitative research in information systems. It clarifies each… CONTINUE READING

From This Paper

Figures, tables, and topics from this paper.

Citations

Publications citing this paper.
Showing 1-10 of 50 extracted citations

References

Publications referenced by this paper.
Showing 1-10 of 42 references

Interpretation, intervention, and reduction in the organizational laboratory: a framework for in-context information system research, Accounting

  • K BRAA, R VIDGEN
  • Management & Information Technology,
  • 1999
Highly Influential
6 Excerpts

Radical development in accounting thought

  • W FCHUA
  • The Accounting Review,
  • 1986
Highly Influential
8 Excerpts

Special issue on action research in information systems: making IS research relevant to practice – foreword

  • R BASKERVILLE, M MYERS
  • MIS Quarterly,
  • 2004
Highly Influential
4 Excerpts

The paradigm is dead, the paradigm is dead ... long live the paradigm: the legacy of Burell and Morgan, Omega

  • T GOLES, R HIRSCHHEIM
  • Vol 28,
  • 2000
Highly Influential
4 Excerpts

Similar Papers

Loading similar papers…