Pragmatic versus syntactic approaches to training deductive reasoning

  title={Pragmatic versus syntactic approaches to training deductive reasoning},
  author={Patricia W. Cheng and Keith J. Holyoak and Richard E. Nisbett and Lindsay M. Oliver},
  journal={Cognitive Psychology},

Tables from this paper

Pragmatic reasoning schemas
Pragmatic Schemas and the Selection Task: To Reason or Not to Reason
Results confirmed previous results indicating that permission schemas do improve selection task performance, but also suggests that this effect is not related to understanding of conditional reasoning.
Pragmatic Reasoning With a Point of View
Abstract Cheng and Holyoak (1985) proposed that realistic reasoning in deontic contexts is based on pragmatic schemas such as those for assessing compliance with or violation of permission and
Training Propositional Reasoning
Two experiments compared the effects of four training conditions on propositional reasoning and found that both kinds of semantic training were significantly more effective than the control and the syntactic training, whereas there were no significant differences between the Control and the Syntactic training.
Using Novel Semantic and Informational Manipulations of Rules to Extend an Interpretive Approach to Conditional Reasoning
This thesis concludes that it is possible to direct subjects towards various interpretations on the task through the use of semantic manipulations that include but are not restricted to the ones observed in this work.
Conditional reasoning and the Wason selection task: Biconditional interpretation instead of reasoning bias
Two experiments were conducted to show that the IF … THEN … rules used in the different versions of Wason's (1966) selection task are not psychologically—though they are logically—equivalent. Some of
The effect of knowledge and context in the elicitation of inferences in class-inclusion reasoning
Abstract Two experiments were carried out with adult subjects to investigate the conditions of production of inferences in a problem-solving task involving reasoning about class inclusion. We tested


Pragmatic reasoning schemas
The effects of statistical training on thinking about everyday problems
If: Some uses
SummaryIt is shown 1. that subjects are sensitive to appropriateness conditions governing the use of IF sentences, 2. that different sorts of IF sentences elicit quite different distributions of
Inductive reasoning: Competence or skill?
alleged fallacy is in interpreting experiments according to what is advocated by Western moral experts. However, we believe that this argument in fact also provides good grounds for the case of
An experiment was performed to determine whether the use of realistic materials would improve performance in a deceptive reasoning problem. The task involved selecting from a set of envelopes those
The use of statistical heuristics in everyday inductive reasoning
In reasoning about everyday problems, people use statistical heuristics, that is, judgmental tools that are rough intuitive equivalents of statistical principles. Statistical heuristics have improved
Natural and contrived experience in a reasoning problem
This study is concerned with the effects of prior experience on a deceptive reasoning problem. In the first experiment the subjects (students) were presented with the problem after they had
Facilitation of reasoning by realism: Effect or non‐effect?
A series of five experiments was performed comparing abstract and thematic materials in Wason's (1966) selection task. The first was designed to test the effect of negated rule components on the
Fact, Fiction, and Forecast
liELsoN Goodman's second book,1 which represents?excepting the first chapter, a reprint of the well-known paper, "The Prob lem of Counterfactual Conditionals"?the "Special Lectures in Philosophy" he