Pragmatic versus syntactic approaches to training deductive reasoning

  title={Pragmatic versus syntactic approaches to training deductive reasoning},
  author={Patricia W. Cheng and Keith J. Holyoak and Richard E. Nisbett and Lindsay M. Oliver},
  journal={Cognitive Psychology},

Tables from this paper

Pragmatic reasoning schemas

Pragmatic Schemas and the Selection Task: To Reason or Not to Reason

Results confirmed previous results indicating that permission schemas do improve selection task performance, but also suggests that this effect is not related to understanding of conditional reasoning.

Précis of Deduction

All of the experiments corroborate the two main predictions of the model theory: inferences requiring only one model are easier than those requiring multiple models, and erroneous conclusions are usually the result of constructing only one of the possible models of the premises.

Pragmatic Reasoning With a Point of View

Abstract Cheng and Holyoak (1985) proposed that realistic reasoning in deontic contexts is based on pragmatic schemas such as those for assessing compliance with or violation of permission and

Training Propositional Reasoning

Two experiments compared the effects of four training conditions on propositional reasoning and found that both kinds of semantic training were significantly more effective than the control and the syntactic training, whereas there were no significant differences between the Control and the Syntactic training.

Using Novel Semantic and Informational Manipulations of Rules to Extend an Interpretive Approach to Conditional Reasoning

This thesis concludes that it is possible to direct subjects towards various interpretations on the task through the use of semantic manipulations that include but are not restricted to the ones observed in this work.

Model theory of deduction: a unified computational approach

Conditional reasoning and the Wason selection task: Biconditional interpretation instead of reasoning bias

Two experiments were conducted to show that the IF … THEN … rules used in the different versions of Wason's (1966) selection task are not psychologically—though they are logically—equivalent. Some of



Pragmatic reasoning schemas

The effects of statistical training on thinking about everyday problems

If: Some uses

SummaryIt is shown 1. that subjects are sensitive to appropriateness conditions governing the use of IF sentences, 2. that different sorts of IF sentences elicit quite different distributions of

Inductive reasoning: Competence or skill?

alleged fallacy is in interpreting experiments according to what is advocated by Western moral experts. However, we believe that this argument in fact also provides good grounds for the case of


An experiment was performed to determine whether the use of realistic materials would improve performance in a deceptive reasoning problem. The task involved selecting from a set of envelopes those

The use of statistical heuristics in everyday inductive reasoning

In reasoning about everyday problems, people use statistical heuristics, that is, judgmental tools that are rough intuitive equivalents of statistical principles. Statistical heuristics have improved

Natural and contrived experience in a reasoning problem

This study is concerned with the effects of prior experience on a deceptive reasoning problem. In the first experiment the subjects (students) were presented with the problem after they had

Facilitation of reasoning by realism: Effect or non‐effect?

A series of five experiments was performed comparing abstract and thematic materials in Wason's (1966) selection task. The first was designed to test the effect of negated rule components on the

Fact, Fiction, and Forecast

liELsoN Goodman's second book,1 which represents?excepting the first chapter, a reprint of the well-known paper, "The Prob lem of Counterfactual Conditionals"?the "Special Lectures in Philosophy" he