Practitioners Theorize, Too

@article{Whittemore2015PractitionersTT,
  title={Practitioners Theorize, Too},
  author={Andrew Whittemore},
  journal={Journal of Planning Education and Research},
  year={2015},
  volume={35},
  pages={76 - 85}
}
  • Andrew Whittemore
  • Published 1 March 2015
  • Business
  • Journal of Planning Education and Research
Many scholars have voiced frustration with planning theory’s marginalization. The purpose of the article is to demonstrate the relevance of theory to practice by exploring what practitioners have theorized. It reviews the development of procedural theories of city planning from 1959 until 1983, and juxtaposes this review with a survey of theory-articulating literature in U.S. trade journals. The article concludes that practitioners value theorizing, that practitioners’ theories mirror academics… 

Figures from this paper

Planners as leaders: finding their comfort zone
Purpose Planners are expected to leave leadership to elected officials. Yet, they are often asked to do more. Should planners lead? The purpose of this paper is to examine how leadership is seen in
Critically Reconsidering Orthodox Ideas: Planning as Teleocratic Intervention and Planning as a Rational Decision Method
ABSTRACT In order to improve contemporary planning theory and practice, this article critically discusses two orthodox ideas of planning that held considerable sway during the twentieth century:
Planning Practice and Academic Research: Views from the Parallel Worlds
AbstractDespite their different roles, academic and professional planners share many common goals. Both are concerned with the future of cities, and committed to goals of sustainability, equity and
The Bounded and Pragmatic Consultant: Fiscal Impact Analysts as Rational Actors
ABSTRACT This article examines how fiscal impact analysts retained by municipal governments across the United States approach their work. Consistent with theories of rationality found in the extant
Teaching planning theory as planner roles in urban planning education
Abstract Planning theory is often portrayed as a subject that urban planning students find too abstract and fail to see the relevance of. This paper advocates the perspective that planning theory can
Public Values and Public Participation: A Case of Collaborative Governance of a Planning Process
Research on public participation in community planning processes often focuses on the design of participation activities and the tensions therein. Past research, however, gives little attention to
New Urbanism as Urban Political Development: Racial Geographies of ‘Intercurrence’ across Greater Seattle
While New Urbanism is now subject to a range of theorizations from different perspectives and disciplinary approaches, it is rarely framed as part of a society’s overall political development. This
DEVELOPMENT OF PLANNING THEORY AND PROFESSION: IMPLICATIONS FOR PLANNING EDUCATION AND PRACTICE IN ARAB STATES
Presently, cities of the Arab world are experiencing many urban ills.  Some are physical, such as environmental degradation, housing problems, unemployment, urban infrastructure-related issues,
Mapping the “housing with care” concept with stakeholders: insights from a UK case study
TLDR
The authors propose that the concepts of “community-orientation” and “service-orientations” are used as a helpful basis for planning negotiations, making implicit divergences explicit and thus better delineated.
Plans: Policy Geographies of Sustainable Growth
This chapter focuses empirically on the “intercurrence of intentions” that characterizes the policy geographies of smart growth across Greater Seattle. Focusing methodologically on the substantive
...
1
2
3
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 142 REFERENCES
Planning Theory's Emerging Paradigm: Communicative Action and Interactive Practice
The long-bemoaned gap between theory and practice in planning is closing as a new type of planning theorist is beginning to dominate the field. These theorists make the gap complaint moot because
Rethinking Planning Theory for a Master’s-Level Curriculum
This article is dedicated to all those faculty members of master’s planning programs who, despite the fact that they are not planning theorists, find themselves teaching planning theory to students
The Practitioner as Theorist The Phenomenology of the Professional Episode
Abstract This paper is an exploration of the gap between theory and practice, and the resulting chasm between knowledge and action. Initially the paper examines the distinction between the logic of
Edge Critics
planning and a requirement to be endured, and planning academics, on average, tolerate it. Within academia, planning theory is marginalized; within practice, it is virtually ignored. These are
Why the Rational Paradigm Persists — The Resistance of Professional Education and Practice to Alternative Forms of Planning
For thirty years planners and critics of planning alike have confronted inadequacies in the traditional model of comprehensive rational planning. Despite this intellectual acknowledgement of the need
Planning Theory as Culture and Experience
ions in a gradual manner.9 Unlike an internship, a course provides only an indirect experience of the real world; on the other hand, it can expose students to a variety of situations and issues in a
Teaching Planning Theory as Order or Fragments?
One can be critical, highly politicized, and prodding without being antagonistic to the profession. Opposition does not entail a rejection of planning, but of a particular type of planning. Just as
Critical Theory and Planning Practice
Abstract In planning practice, communication is political. When a community organization or a developer obtains information can be as important as what information is obtained. What planners do not
Why the Rational Paradigm Persists: Tales from the Field
A decade ago, Linda Dalton (1986) posed a puzzle: Planning academics and practitioners have both recognized that planning decisions do not follow the rational model, and yet they continue to espouse
A theoretical basis for participatory planning
Arguments are presented for the reconsideration of models which guide planning behavior and structure planning organizations. Hierarchical organizations are contrasted with reticular organizations
...
1
2
3
4
5
...