Précis of The Intentional Stance

@article{Dennett1988PrcisOT,
  title={Pr{\'e}cis of The Intentional Stance},
  author={Daniel C. Dennett},
  journal={Behavioral and Brain Sciences},
  year={1988},
  volume={11},
  pages={495 - 505}
}
  • D. Dennett
  • Published 1 September 1988
  • Philosophy, Psychology
  • Behavioral and Brain Sciences
Abstract The intentional stance is the strategy of prediction and explanation that attributes beliefs, desires, and other “intentional” states to systems – living and nonliving – and predicts future behavior from what it would be rational for an agent to do, given those beliefs and desires. Any system whose performance can be thus predicted and explained is an intentional system, whatever its innards. The strategy of treating parts of the world as intentional systems is the foundation of “folk… 
Cognition, natural selection, and the intentional stance
TLDR
Daniel Dennett's oversimplified conception of nature's rationale undermines the usefulness of the intentional stance as a tool in cognitive ethology and can be made more useful in investigating animal cognition by modifying its application to questions of biological function.
The Intentional Stance Test-2: How to Measure the Tendency to Adopt Intentional Stance Towards Robots
TLDR
The structure of a task aiming at evaluating to what extent people adopt intentional stance towards robot actions, the Intentional Stance task (IST), was developed and validated and showed a reliable psychometric structure.
Intentionality, qualia, and mind/brain identity
TLDR
It is argued that functionalism is able to account for (non-intrinsic) intentionality, but not for consciousness, which has implications for the computational paradigm, as well as for Searle's Chinese room thought experiment.
Outline of a sensory-motor perspective on intrinsically moral agents
TLDR
It is proposed that moral behaviour of artificial agents could (and should) be intrinsically grounded in their own sensory-motor experiences and laid the foundation for robots that can feel guilt, shame and pride, that have compassion and that know how to assign responsibility and blame.
Effect of an Agent's Contingent Responses on Maintaining an Intentional Stance
TLDR
It is concluded that the contingent responses are capable of maintaining the intentional stance during the main task from the behavior analysis and suggested that only the participants who actively joined the icebreaker with the contingent agent be induced into taking an intentional stance.
The Role of Social Reasoning in the Development of Self and Social Regulation
In this dissertation I consider young children’s developing understanding of their own and other people’s social conduct, an understanding that involves a refined attunement to the social activity of
An intentional interpretive perspective
TLDR
A behavior-analytic account of attributing intention is provided that identifies the establishing conditions for speaking of intention and the extent to which the authors speak of intentions when the observed individual’s behavior is contingency shaped or under instructional control.
Behavioral explanations and intentional explanations in psychology.
TLDR
The philosopher Dennett justifies intentional explanations on the grounds that they are provisional and can be cashed out in principle so that when Dennett's argument is applied to evolutionary biology, it becomes a justification of creationism.
Individual differences in reasoning: Implications for the rationality debate?
TLDR
In a series of experiments involving most of the classic tasks in the heuristics and biases literature, the implications of individual differences in performance for each of the four explanations of the normative/descriptive gap are examined.
...
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 116 REFERENCES
The Intentional Stance.
How are we able to understand and anticipate each other in everyday life, in our daily interactions? Through the use of such "folk" concepts as belief, desire, intention, and expectation, asserts
Minds, brains, and programs
  • J. Searle
  • Philosophy
    Behavioral and Brain Sciences
  • 1980
TLDR
Only a machine could think, and only very special kinds of machines, namely brains and machines with internal causal powers equivalent to those of brains, and no program by itself is sufficient for thinking.
Methodological solipsism considered as a research strategy in cognitive psychology
  • J. Fodor
  • Psychology, Philosophy
    Behavioral and Brain Sciences
  • 1980
Abstract The paper explores the distinction between two doctrines, both of which inform theory construction in much of modern cognitive psychology: the representational theory of mind and the
Individualism and psychology
Recent years have seen in psychology — and overlapping parts of linguistics, artificial intelligence, and the social sciences — the development of some semblance of agreement about an approach to the
Intentional systems in cognitive ethology: The “Panglossian paradigm” defended
  • D. Dennett
  • Psychology
    Behavioral and Brain Sciences
  • 1983
Abstract Ethologists and others studying animal behavior in a “cognitive” spirit are in need of a descriptive language and method that are neither anachronistically bound by behaviorist scruples nor
Rules and representations
Abstract The book from which these sections are excerpted (N. Chomsky, Rules and Representations, Columbia University Press, 1980) is concerned with the prospects for assimilating the study of human
Does the chimpanzee have a theory of mind?
Abstract An individual has a theory of mind if he imputes mental states to himself and others. A system of inferences of this kind is properly viewed as a theory because such states are not directly
From folk psychology to cognitive science: The case against belief.
The average person has a rich belief system about the thoughts and motives of people. From antiquity to the beginning of this century, Stephen Stich points out, this "folk psychology" was employed in
Brainstorms: Philosophical Essays on Mind and Psychology
  • D. Dennett
  • Psychology, Philosophy
    The Philosophical Review
  • 1980
TLDR
This book questions the relationship between psychology and morality as well as exploring the concept of human intentionality, and argues that intentional attributes such as desires, goals, beliefs and knowledge are purely mechanistic.
...
...