Powerful perceivers, powerless objects: Flexibility of powerholders’ social attention☆

  title={Powerful perceivers, powerless objects: Flexibility of powerholders’ social attention☆},
  author={Jennifer R. Overbeck and Bernadette Park},
  journal={Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes},

Figures and Tables from this paper

Power and the objectification of social targets.
Under conditions of power, approach toward a social target was driven more by the target's usefulness, defined in terms of the perceiver's goals, than in low-power and baseline conditions.
Power and social distance.
Illusory Power Transference
We use two experiments to investigate “illusory power transference,” in which individuals minimally associated with powerful others act as if they themselves are powerful outside the boundaries of
Less power or powerless? Egocentric empathy gaps and the irony of having little versus no power in social decision making.
Using a modified ultimatum game, the authors show that allocators lower their offers to recipients when the power difference shifts in favor of the allocator, but when recipients are completely powerless, offers increase.
Power and the Social Self
This chapter presents a comprehensive, scholarly review on the effects of power on powerholders’ social judgments and behavior. Power is with no doubt a key concept that characterizes asymmetric
The Self-Reinforcing Nature of Social Hierarchy: Origins and Consequences of Power and Status
Hierarchy is such a defining feature of organizations that its forms and basic functions are often taken for granted in organizational research. In this chapter, we revisit some basic sociological
Power and affordances: when the situation has more power over powerful than powerless individuals.
  • A. Guinote
  • Psychology
    Journal of personality and social psychology
  • 2008
Six studies examined how power affects responses to situational affordances and found that powerful individuals change behavior across situations more than powerless individuals.
Power that Builds Others and Power that Breaks: Effects of Power and Humility on Altruism and Incivility in Female Employees
Results from a field study in daycare centers showed that legitimate power (a dimension of positional power) was positively associated with incivility and personal power—referent power and expert power—was positively associated altruism and was negatively associated withincivility.


When power does not corrupt: superior individuation processes among powerful perceivers.
Results suggest that the effect of power on social judgment may be more complex and multifaceted than has previously been acknowledged.
Control, Interdependence and Power: Understanding Social Cognition in Its Social Context
A theory of control in interdependence and power relations is supported by a program of laboratory research. Control needs are basic and predict information-seeking in social relationships. Those
Prophecies of power: Motivational implications of social power for behavioral confirmation.
The effects of relative social power on social motivation and behavioral confirmation were assessed. Participants, randomly assigned to the roles of perceiver and target, conversed over an intercom
Controlling other people. The impact of power on stereotyping.
  • S. Fiske
  • Psychology
    The American psychologist
  • 1993
A theory of the mutually reinforcing interaction between power and stereotyping, mediated by attention, is presented and two legal cases and a body of research illustrate the theory and suggest organizational change strategies.
Why do superiors attend to negative stereotypic information about their subordinates : Effects of power legitimacy on social perception
Power can be defined as control over people's outcomes. using this definition, we explored the impact of power on attentional processes involved in impression formation. Because powerful individuals
Why People Obey
Recent sociological studies of power in organizations, although oriented toward practical ends, offer promise for a general sociological theory of power. Empirically grounded organizational studies
From power to action.
Three experiments investigated the hypothesis that power increases an action orientation in the power holder, even in contexts where power is not directly experienced, suggesting that the experience of power leads to the performance of goal-directed behavior.
Power Can Bias Impression Processes: Stereotyping Subordinates by Default and by Design
Powerholders may engage in two stereotyping processes: (a) by default, inattention to stereotype-inconsistent information, due to lack of dependency, and (b) by design, effortful attention to
Lonely at the Top
The effect of power- versus nonpower-oriented roles on the exchange of personal information was explored. It was predicted that the form of this exchange would be governed by the role context of the
Power in stereotypically masculine domains: a Social Influence Strategy X Stereotype Match model.
The hypothesis that stereotypes of groups to which low-power people belong should influence the perceptions and behavior of powerful people only when those stereotypes are both contextually relevant and provide information of relevance given powerful people's beliefs about the relation between subordinates and goal attainment is examined.