• Corpus ID: 152791453

Power and Restraint: Liberal Foreign Policy Theory and America's Rise: 1904-1912

@article{Meiser2010PowerAR,
  title={Power and Restraint: Liberal Foreign Policy Theory and America's Rise: 1904-1912},
  author={Jeffrey W. Meiser},
  journal={Political Theory: History of Political Thought eJournal},
  year={2010}
}
  • Jeffrey W. Meiser
  • Published 2010
  • Political Science
  • Political Theory: History of Political Thought eJournal
Between the 1898 and 1941 American foreign policy was much more restrained than other great powers and rising powers of this era despite the fact that the USA had the largest economy and highest rate of economic growth among the great powers. Therein lies a puzzle of considerable historical and theoretical significance. Classical/neoclassical and offensive realists would expect a rising power to be especially expansionist in its foreign policy, and yet the U.S. never even matched the… 

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 161 REFERENCES
From Wealth to Power: The Unusual Origins of America's World Role
What turns rich nations into great powers? How do wealthy countries begin extending their influence abroad? These questions are vital to an understanding of the emergence of a new power - a source of
The Mainsprings of American Foreign Policy: The National Interest vs. Moral Abstractions
It is often said that the foreign policy of the United States is in need of maturing and that the American people and their government must grow up if they want to emerge victorious from the trials
The International Wanderings of a Liberal Idea, or Why Liberals Can Learn to Stop Worrying and Love the Balance of Power
Scholars in international relations have failed to note a paradox about the balance of power: the concept of checks and balances and equilibria underlie classical Liberal constitutional and economic
Defining the National Interest: Conflict and Change in American Foreign Policy
The United States has been marked by a highly politicized and divisive history of foreign policy-making. This study asks why the nation's leaders find it so difficult to define the national interest.
War Makes the State, but Not as It Pleases: Homeland Security and American Anti-Statism
The shock of war is thought to be closely associated with the growth of the state, in the United States and elsewhere. Yet each proposal to significantly expand state power in the United States since
Financial Missionaries to the World: The Politics and Culture of Dollar Diplomacy, 1900–1930
liberals rather than the “nervous liberals.” Nonetheless, to his credit, Gary rises above a perfectionistic stance in his reflections on one of the central dilemmas of modem democracy: its obligation
The Philadelphian system: sovereignty, arms control, and balance of power in the American states-union, circa 1787–1861
A rediscovery of the long-forgotten republican version of liberal political theory has arresting implications for the theory and practice of international relations. Republican liberalism has a
EXPLORING PUZZLES IN POWER-TRANSITION THEORY: IMPLICATIONS FOR SINO-AMERICAN RELATIONS
THE IDEA OF power transition has deservedly drawn much attention due to its relevance for theory and policy. The original theory behind this concept, formulated by A. F. K. Organski some time ago,
Neoclassical realism and theories of foreign policy
Although international relations theory has been dominated for two decades by debates over theories of international politics, recently there has been a surge of interest in theories of foreign
Defending the National Interest: Raw Materials Investments and U.S. Foreign Policy
Stephen Krasner's assumption of a distinction between state and society is the root of his argument for the superiority of a statist interpretation of American foreign policy. Here he challenges the
...
1
2
3
4
5
...