Potential benefits of treatment summaries for survivors' health and information needs: results from a LIVESTRONG survey.

@article{Rechis2014PotentialBO,
  title={Potential benefits of treatment summaries for survivors' health and information needs: results from a LIVESTRONG survey.},
  author={Ruth Rechis and Ellen Burke Beckjord and Stephanie A Nutt},
  journal={Journal of oncology practice},
  year={2014},
  volume={10 1},
  pages={
          75-8
        }
}
PURPOSE Treatment summaries (TSs), a critical component of survivorship care plans, have been identified as a tool to improve outcomes for the 14 million cancer survivors in the United States. METHODS In 2010, the LIVESTRONG Foundation fielded the LIVESTRONG Survey for People Affected by Cancer. The survey was designed to assess the physical, emotional, and practical concerns after cancer as well as receipt of treatment summaries. Participants were recruited online and through national… 

Figures and Tables from this paper

Psychological distress among adult cancer survivors: importance of survivorship care plan
TLDR
Adult cancer survivors may highly benefit from the receipt of SCP not only short-term but also long-term for their overall psychological well-being.
Cancer survivors' receipt of treatment summaries and implications for patient-centered communication and quality of care.
Impact of treatment summaries for cancer survivors: a systematic review
TLDR
This systematic review found that TS may have a positive impact on patient understandings about and perceptions of cancer care, however, more robust research including perspectives of cancer survivors is required.
Survivorship Care Planning and Unmet Information and Service Needs Among Adolescent and Young Adult Cancer Survivors.
TLDR
Substantial evidence is provided for the importance of survivorship care planning including written treatment summaries and follow-up care instructions as a way to improve survivor outcomes and to reduce unmet information and service needs of AYA survivors.
Cancer Survivors’ Reported Discussions with Health Care Providers About Follow-Up Care and Receipt of Written Care Plans
TLDR
It is indicated that most patient-provider discussions cover information on surveillance, with less emphasis on late and long-term effects, lifestyle and health behaviors, and substantially less focusing on emotional and social needs.
The Integration of Survivorship Care Planning at a Comprehensive Cancer Center
TLDR
Nurse practitioners at a National Cancer Institute–designated academic medical center worked to develop a standardized process to deliver SCPs to all eligible patients and embed them into the electronic medical record using a templated note created for the EMR.
Summing it up: An integrative review of studies of cancer survivorship care plans (2006‐2013)
TLDR
An integrative review of existing evidence regarding SCPs found evidence of improved outcomes associated with SCP is limited, and future research that addresses the methodological concerns of extant studies is needed regarding SCP use, content, and outcomes.
The state of cancer survivorship programming in Commission on Cancer-accredited hospitals in Georgia
TLDR
Findings from two surveys assessing survivorship care in Commission on Cancer (CoC)-accredited hospitals in Georgia indicated the importance of collaboration and shared responsibility for Survivorship care.
Follow-up care instructions, treatment summaries, and cancer survivors’ receipt of follow-up health care and late/long term effects
  • J. Jabson
  • Medicine, Psychology
    Supportive Care in Cancer
  • 2014
TLDR
The findings suggest that SCP may facilitate follow-up care needed by cancer survivors after cancer treatment is completed, and is among the first to document the associations between SCP and survivors’ attendance at regular medical appointments, cancer surveillance, preventive cancer screenings, and late/long term effects.
Survivorship care planning in a comprehensive cancer center using an implementation framework.
TLDR
How routine SCP delivery was established at the Robert H Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center in Chicago, Illinois, is described, using the Quality Implementation Framework, to facilitate ongoing evaluation of implementation and quality improvement.
...
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 20 REFERENCES
Evaluating survivorship care plans: results of a randomized, clinical trial of patients with breast cancer.
  • E. Grunfeld, J. Julian, M. Levine
  • Medicine
    Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology
  • 2011
TLDR
The hypothesis that SCPs for breast cancer survivors improves patient-reported outcomes is not supported, and SCPs were no better than a standard discharge visit with the oncologist to facilitate transfer.
Failing to plan is planning to fail: improving the quality of care with survivorship care plans.
  • C. Earle
  • Medicine
    Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology
  • 2006
TLDR
The elements of the proposed survivorship care plan are reviewed and areas of research and development needed to make them part of standard oncology practice are discussed.
Survivorship care planning after the Institute of Medicine recommendations: how are we faring?
TLDR
Evaluated concordance of treatment summaries (TSs) and survivorship care plans (SCPs) delivered to breast cancer survivors within the LIVESTRONG™ Network of Survivorship Centers of Excellence with Institute of Medicine (IOM) recommendations is evaluated and additional structure/process variables are described.
Survivorship care plans in research and practice
TLDR
Survivors' and providers' opinions about the use of SCPs are favorable, but there are barriers to implementation and many components recommended by the IOM framework are rarely included.
Health-related information needs in a large and diverse sample of adult cancer survivors: implications for cancer care
TLDR
Most cancer survivors needed more information about maintaining good health outcomes during survivorship, and health communication interventions have excellent potential to address survivors’ information needs while improving quality of follow-up cancer care and health-related quality of life.
Models of care for post-treatment follow-up of adult cancer survivors: a systematic review and quality appraisal of the evidence
TLDR
Although the evidence base was rated as low quality, nurse-led and primary care physician models of follow-up care were equivalent for detecting recurrence and consensus suggests that cancer survivors may benefit from coordinated transition planning that includes the provision of survivorship care plans as part of standard care.
What happens now? Psychosocial care for cancer survivors after medical treatment completion.
  • A. Stanton
  • Psychology, Medicine
    Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology
  • 2012
TLDR
The goals of this article are to document the need for attention to psychosocial domains during the re-entry and later phases of the cancer survivor trajectory, offer an overview of current evidence on efficacy ofPsychosocial interventions during those phases, and offer suggestions for application and research regarding post-treatment psychossocial care.
Evaluation of the Quality of Life in Adult Cancer Survivors (QLACS) scale for long-term cancer survivors in a sample of breast cancer survivors
TLDR
The QLACS may serve as a useful measure for assessing HRQL among long-term breast cancer survivors that are not otherwise captured by generic measures or those specifically designed for newly diagnosed patients.
Survivorship care: models and programs.
Differences Between Primary Care Physicians’ and Oncologists’ Knowledge, Attitudes and Practices Regarding the Care of Cancer Survivors
TLDR
Improving cancer survivors’ care may require more effective communication between these two groups to increase PCPs’ confidence in their knowledge, and must also address oncologists’ attitudes regarding PC Ps’ ability to care for cancer survivors.
...
...