Post hoc interpretation of urodynamic evaluation is qualitatively different than interpretation at the time of urodynamic study.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES Intraobserver reliability of post hoc urodynamic interpretation is greater than interobserver reliability, attributable to interpreter bias. If post hoc interpretation is qualitatively similar to interpretation at the time of study by a urodynamicist in attendance ("live" interpretation), a similar intraobserver bias should be observed. We… (More)
DOI: 10.1002/nau.20730

Topics

  • Presentations referencing similar topics