Positron emission tomography (PET) attenuation correction artefacts in PET/CT and PET/MRI.

@article{Buchbender2013PositronET,
  title={Positron emission tomography (PET) attenuation correction artefacts in PET/CT and PET/MRI.},
  author={Christian Buchbender and Verena Hartung-Knemeyer and Michael Forsting and Gerald Antoch and T A Heusner},
  journal={The British journal of radiology},
  year={2013},
  volume={86 1025},
  pages={20120570}
}
OBJECTIVE To compare the effect of implanted medical materials on (18)F-fludeoxyglucose ((18)F-FDG) positron emission tomography (PET)/MRI using a Dixon-based segmentation method for MRI-based attenuation correction (MRAC), PET/CT and CT-based attenuation-corrected PET (PETCTAC). METHODS 12 patients (8 males and 4 females; age 58±11 years) with implanted medical materials prospectively underwent whole-body (18)F-FDG PET/CT and PET/MRI. CT, MRI and MRAC maps as well as PETCTAC and PETMRAC… CONTINUE READING
Recent Discussions
This paper has been referenced on Twitter 2 times over the past 90 days. VIEW TWEETS
10 Citations
15 References
Similar Papers

Citations

Publications citing this paper.
Showing 1-10 of 10 extracted citations

References

Publications referenced by this paper.
Showing 1-10 of 15 references

Do dental implants affect PET / CT and PET / MR image quality equally ?

  • M Werner, J Wiegand, J Kupferschläger, C Lois, I Bezrukov, C Pfannenberg
  • Nuklearmedizin
  • 2012

Similar Papers

Loading similar papers…