Positive psychology and romantic scientism.

  title={Positive psychology and romantic scientism.},
  author={Nicholas J. L. Brown and Alan D. Sokal and Harris L. Friedman},
  journal={The American psychologist},
  volume={69 6},
Replies to the comments of Nickerson (see record 2014-36500-010), Guastello (see record 2014-36500-011), Musau (see record 2014-36500-013), Hämäläinen et al. (see record 2014-36500-014), and Lefebvre and Schwartz (see record 2014-36500-015) on the authors article (see record 2013-24609-001). Fredrickson and Losada's (2005) article was the subject of over 350 scholarly citations before our critique (Brown et al., 2013) appeared, and its principal "conclusions" have been featured in many lectures… 
134 his article is a response to what Professor Vázquez (2013) considers the “enemies” of Positive Psychology (hereinafter PP). The label of “enemy” is completely false. In fact, neither
There Is No Empirical Evidence for Critical Positivity Ratios: Comment on Fredrickson (2013)
Fredrickson and Losada (American Psychologist, 2005, 60, 678-686) theorized that a ratio of positive affect to negative affect (positivity ratio) of 2.9013 acts as a critical minimum for well-being.
Implications of Debunking the “Critical Positivity Ratio” for Humanistic Psychology: Introduction to Special Issue
An extraordinary claim was made by one of the leading researchers within positive psychology, namely, there is a universal–invariant ratio between positive to negative emotions that serves as a
Positive ratios revisited: reports of the theory’s death have been greatly exaggerated
ABSTRACT The states of mind (SOM) model-related ratios of positive/negative affect to psychological functioning, findings that were later integrated into Lefebvre’s mathematical model of
Mindfulness and the 'psychological imagination'.
The psychological imagination permeates the expression of mindfulness as a solution to social ills and symbolises the comparative decline of assumptions implicit in Mills' 20th century rousing call to social scientists.
Scientific Pollyannaism of Authentic Happiness, Learned Optimism, Flow and the Empirically Correct Positivity Ratios
This chapter positions contemporary “positive psychology as an iteration of scientific Pollyannaism,” tracking the development of this movement, including the financial and political support it was
Best-Practice Guidelines for Positive Psychological Intervention Research Design
Positive psychological interventions (PPIs) have been subjected to considerable criticism in recent years. Following similar movements across other domains of psychology, attempts to replicate
Exploratory Structural Equation Modeling: Practical Guidelines and Tutorial With a Convenient Online Tool for Mplus
Critics of positive psychology have questioned the validity of positive psychological assessment measures (PPAMs), which negatively affects the credibility and public perception of the discipline.
On reproducibility and replicability: Arguing for open science practices and methodological improvements at the South African Journal of Industrial Psychology
Problematisation: In recent years, psychology has been going through a crisis of sorts. Research methods and practices have come under increased scrutiny, with many issues identified as negatively
Everyday Heroism in Practicing Psychology
Heroism requires acting altruistically in the face of considerable risk. Professions such as psychology are based on working toward a public good and accordingly provide offsetting privileges for the


No empirical evidence for critical positivity ratios.
It is pointed out many times over many years that the data and the analysis used to test a theory should correspond to that theory and that a test of a within-person theory nearly always requires within- person data and analysis.
The persistence of wishful thinking.
In response to a critique, Fredrickson and Losada withdrew their nonlinear dynamics model, but Fredricks on (December December 2013) reaffirmed some claims concerning positivity ratios on the basis of empirical studies and the alleged supporting evidence is reviewed.
The place of mathematical models in psychology and the social sciences.
Although Brown et al.'s critique of the work of Fredrickson and Losada serves an important role in identifying potential flaws in the theory, it goes too far by using terms such as "completely illusory 'applications' of mathematics" and may inadvertently discourage junior researchers in pursuing the use of mathematical methods in psychology.
An empirical ratio in search of a theory.
This comment shows how to account for the phenomenon of the 3:1 ratio using a mathematical model of reflexive awareness that captures the property of the mind to model self and other at increasing levels of awareness.
Positive psychology. An introduction.
The authors outline a framework for a science of positive psychology, point to gaps in the authors' knowledge, and predict that the next century will see a science and profession that will come to understand and build the factors that allow individuals, communities, and societies to flourish.
Positive affect and the complex dynamics of human flourishing.
Findings suggest that a set of general mathematical principles may describe the relations between positive affect and human flourishing.
The complex dynamics of wishful thinking: the critical positivity ratio.
It is concluded that Fredrickson and Losada's claim to have demonstrated the existence of a critical minimum positivity ratio of 2.9013 is entirely unfounded and is urged to exercise caution in the use of advanced mathematical tools, such as nonlinear dynamics, and in particular to verify that the elementary conditions for their valid application have been met.
Nonlinear dynamical models in psychology are widespread and testable.
Comments on the article by Fredrickson and Losada about nonlinear dynamical systems (NDS) models in psychology that would-be researchers should understand if the goal is to move the science forward are offered.
Theoretical Amnesia
Conventional wisdom has it that there is — or at least there ought to be — a correspondence between theoretical and political positions. But the very labelling of it as conventional wisdom already
Mathematical modeling is more than fitting equations.
Comments on the comments made by Brown et al. regarding the Fredrickson and Losada article discussed the use of differential equations in science described how the conceptual use of mathematical models is essential in many fields.