Pooling of Unshared Information in Group Decision Making: Biased Information Sampling During Discussion

@article{Stasser1985PoolingOU,
  title={Pooling of Unshared Information in Group Decision Making: Biased Information Sampling During Discussion},
  author={Garold Stasser and William Titus},
  journal={Journal of Personality and Social Psychology},
  year={1985},
  volume={48},
  pages={1467-1478}
}
  • G. Stasser, W. Titus
  • Published 1 June 1985
  • Geology, Psychology
  • Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
Decision-making groups can potentially benefit from pooling members' information, particularly when members individually have partial and biased information but collectively can compose an unbiased characterization of the decision alternatives. The proposed biased sampling model of group discussion, however, suggests that group members often fail to effectively pool their information because discussion tends to be dominated by (a) information that members hold in common before discussion and (b… 

Figures and Tables from this paper

Informational Centrality and Member Participation During Group Decision Making
This study examined whether participation during group decision-making discussions is affected by the degree to which members hold predominantly shared versus predominantly unshared decision-relevant
Information Sampling in Decision-Making Groups
This study examined the impact of members 'task-relevant status (i.e., prior task experience) on the bias in decision-making groups to discuss more common (shared) than unique (unshared) information.
The dissemination of critical, unshared information in decision-making groups: the effects of pre-discussion dissent
Previous research in group decision making has found that in situations of a hidden profile (i.e. the best choice alternative is hidden from individual members as they consider their pre-discussion
The sampling of critical, unshared information in decision-making groups: the role of an informed minority
A collective information sampling model and observations of discussion content suggest that decision-making groups often fail to disseminate unshared information. This paper examines the role that a
Decision-Making Groups Attenuate the Discussion Bias in Favor of Shared Information: A Meta-Analysis
Groups often focus their discussions on information that all members know at the outset. To test how robust the sampling advantage for shared information is, a meta-analysis was conducted. The
Information flow and influence during collective search, discussion, and choice
If decision-relevant information is distributed among team members, the group is inclined to focus on shared information and to neglect unshared information, resulting often in suboptimal decisions.
Information Exchange in Group Decision Making: The Hidden Profile Problem Reconsidered
TLDR
A hidden profile experiment is reported where homogenous preferences over choice characteristics are induced and financial incentives are provided so that the common purpose assumptions of the model hold more completely than in past experiments.
Effects of Consensus Information and Task Demonstrability on Preference-Consistent Information Evaluation and Decision Quality in Group Decision Making
Groups often fail to solve hidden profiles even when all information is exchanged. This is partly due to biased evaluation of information. We examined the effects of consensus information and task
The Reevaluation of Information during Group Discussion
Communication in small groups often yields uniform judgments among members, particularly when members are similar to one another. This investigation empirically tested whether group discussion leads
...
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 26 REFERENCES
Group decision and social interaction: A theory of social decision schemes.
This paper proposes a general theory (social decision scheme theory) for many kinds of group decision making and illustrates some special case models with a variety of data from several experimental
The group polarization phenomenon.
Experiments exploring the effects of group discussion on attitudes, jury decisions, ethical decisions, judgments, person perceptions, negotiations, and risk taking (other than the choice-dilemmas
Psychology of Group Influence
Preface. 1. Paul B. Paulus An Overview and Evaluation of Group Influence Part 1: Basic Group Influence 2. Russell G. Geen Alternative Conceptions of Social Facilitation 3. Eric S. Knowles Spatial
Small Group Decision Making: Communication and the Group Process
TLDR
The Anatomy of Communication in Decision-Making Groups: Improving Effectiveness and Observing and Analyzing Small Group Communication is presented.
Small Group Decision Making
TLDR
A novel propellant composition comprises granules of ammonium nitrate and nitrocellulose that exhibits improved water resistance, lower water absorbency and ignition is facilitated.
Victims Of Groupthink
...
...