Political Extremism Is Supported by an Illusion of Understanding

@article{Fernbach2013PoliticalEI,
  title={Political Extremism Is Supported by an Illusion of Understanding},
  author={Philip M. Fernbach and Todd Rogers and C. Fox and S. Sloman},
  journal={Psychological Science},
  year={2013},
  volume={24},
  pages={939 - 946}
}
People often hold extreme political attitudes about complex policies. We hypothesized that people typically know less about such policies than they think they do (the illusion of explanatory depth) and that polarized attitudes are enabled by simplistic causal models. Asking people to explain policies in detail both undermined the illusion of explanatory depth and led to attitudes that were more moderate (Experiments 1 and 2). Although these effects occurred when people were asked to generate a… Expand

Figures and Topics from this paper

Political Extremism Predicts Belief in Conspiracy Theories
Historical records suggest that the political extremes—at both the “left” and the “right”—substantially endorsed conspiracy beliefs about other-minded groups. The present contribution empiricallyExpand
Extreme Political Beliefs Predict Dogmatic Intolerance
Dogmatic intolerance—defined as a tendency to reject, and consider as inferior, any ideological belief that differs from one’s own—is often assumed to be more prominent at the political right than atExpand
Explanation Hubris and Conspiracy Theories: A Case of the 2016 Presidential Election
TLDR
It is found that participants who still endorsed high levels of understanding after generating an explanation for the 2016 election were also more likely to endorse the election was illegitimate, however, this finding only obtained for participants who voted for the losing candidate. Expand
Forecasting tournaments, epistemic humility and attitude depolarization
TLDR
This work examines the hypothesis that, in the process of thinking critically about their beliefs, tournament participants become more moderate in their own political attitudes and those they attribute to the other side, thus depolarizing unnecessarily polarized debates. Expand
The illusion of explanatory depth and endorsement of conspiracy beliefs
The average person possesses superficial understanding of complex causal relations and, consequently, tends to overestimate the quality and depth of their explanatory knowledge. In this study, weExpand
The psychological advantage of unfalsifiability: the appeal of untestable religious and political ideologies.
TLDR
In a world where beliefs and ideas are becoming more easily testable by data, unfalsifiability might be an attractive aspect to include in one's belief systems, and how it may contribute to polarization, intractability, and the marginalization of science in public discourse is discussed. Expand
Does Extreme Political Ideology Predict Conspiracy Beliefs, Economic Evaluations and Political Trust? Evidence From Sweden
A large volume of academic research has demonstrated that individuals who profess radical political ideology, both left- and right-wing, tend to share similar underlying psychological patterns. ByExpand
The Partisan Brain: An Identity-Based Model of Political Belief
TLDR
An identity-based model of belief is proposed for understanding the influence of partisanship on cognitive processes and helps to explain why people place party loyalty over policy, and even over truth. Expand
The partisan mind: Is extreme political partisanship related to cognitive inflexibility?
TLDR
Findings suggest that the rigidity with which individuals process and respond to nonpolitical information may be related to the extremity of their partisan identities. Expand
Fear Among the Extremes
TLDR
It is concluded that negative emotions and outgroup derogation flourish among the extremes, particularly among left- and right-wing extremists. Expand
...
1
2
3
4
5
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 30 REFERENCES
What Americans Know about Politics and Why It Matters
This book is the most comprehensive analysis ever written about the American public's factual knowledge of politics. Drawing on extensive survey data, including much that is original, two experts inExpand
Biased Assimilation and Attitude Polarization: The Effects of Prior Theories on Subsequently Considered Evidence
People who hold strong opinions on complex social issues are likely to examine relevant empirical evidence in a biased manner. They are apt to accept "confirming" evidence at face value whileExpand
The misunderstood limits of folk science: an illusion of explanatory depth
TLDR
The mechanisms behind the initial confidence and behind overconfidence, the illusion of depth with explanatory knowledge, and the roles of intuitive theories in models of concepts and cognition are explored. Expand
WHEN DELIBERATION PRODUCES EXTREMISM
Abstract What are the effects of deliberation about political issues by likeminded people? An experimental investigation involving two deliberative exercises, one among self-identified liberals andExpand
Political polarization projection: social projection of partisan attitude extremity and attitudinal processes.
TLDR
Supporting this explanation, polarization projection increased when people introspected about their own attitudinal processes, which increased the accessibility of those processes, and implications for perceptions of partisanship, social judgment, and civic behavior are discussed. Expand
Democracy and Deliberation: New Directions for Democratic Reform
This book proposes a new kind of democracy for the modern era, one that not only gives citizens more power but also allows them more opportunities to exercise this power thoughtfully. James S.Expand
Missing the trees for the forest: a construal level account of the illusion of explanatory depth.
TLDR
A novel factor that might contribute to such diverse social-cognitive shortcomings as stereotyping, egocentrism, and the planning fallacy is suggested, where people adopt abstract representations of concepts that should be represented concretely. Expand
Explanation Fiends and Foes: How Mechanistic Detail Determines Understanding and Preference
People differ in their threshold for satisfactory causal understanding and therefore in the type of explanation that will engender understanding and maximize the appeal of a novel product.Expand
Self-Generated Attitude Change
Publisher Summary This chapter discusses self-generated attitude change. The thought about some nonneutral attitude object in the absence of any new external information or change in overt behaviorExpand
Multiple explanation: A consider-an-alternative strategy for debiasing judgments.
Previous research has suggested that an effective strategy for debiasing judgments is to have participants consider the opposite. The present research proposes that considering any plausibleExpand
...
1
2
3
...