• DOI:10.1086/303160
• Corpus ID: 4386607

Plumage Reflectance and the Objective Assessment of Avian Sexual Dichromatism

@article{Cuthill1999PlumageRA,
  title={Plumage Reflectance and the Objective Assessment of Avian Sexual Dichromatism},
  author={Innes C. Cuthill and Andrew T. D. Bennett and Julian C. Partridge and E. J. Maier},
  journal={The American Naturalist},
  year={1999},
  volume={153},
  pages={183 - 200}
}

• I. Cuthill, A. Bennett, +1 author E. Maier
• Published 1 February 1999
• Psychology
• The American Naturalist

Assessment of color using human vision (or standards based thereon) is central to tests of many evolutionary hypotheses. Yet fundamental differences in color vision between humans and other animals call this approach into question. Here we use techniques for objectively assessing color patterns that avoid reliance on species‐specific (e.g., human) perception. Reflectance spectra are the invariant features that we expect the animal's color cognition to have evolved to extract. We performed multivariate analyses on principal components derived from >2,600 reflectance spectra (300–720 nm) sampled in a stratified random design from different body regions of male and female starlings in breeding plumage. Starlings possess spatially complex plumage patterns and extensive areas of iridescence. Our study revealed previously unnoticed sex differences in plumage coloration and the nature of iridescent and noniridescent sex differences. Sex differences occurred in some body regions but not others, were more pronounced at some wavelengths (both ultraviolet and human visible), and involved differences in mean reflectance and spectral shape. Discriminant analysis based on principal components were sufficient to sex correctly 100% of our sample. If hidden sexual dichromatism is widespread, then it has important implications for classifications of animals as mono‐ or dimorphic and for taxonomic and conservation purposes.