Pleading Innocents : Laboratory Evidence of Plea Bargaining ’ S Innocence Problem

@inproceedings{Edkins2012PleadingI,
  title={Pleading Innocents : Laboratory Evidence of Plea Bargaining ’ S Innocence Problem},
  author={Vanessa A. Edkins and Lucian E. Dervan},
  year={2012}
}
We investigated plea bargaining by making students actually guilty or innocent of a cheating offense and varying the sentence that they would face if found ‘guilty’ by a review board. As hypothesized, guilty students were more likely than innocent students to accept a plea deal (i.e., admit guilt and lose credit; akin to accepting a sentence of probation) (Chi-square=8.63, p<.01) but we did not find an effect of sentence severity. Innocent students, though not as likely to plead as guilty… CONTINUE READING

From This Paper

Figures, tables, and topics from this paper.
1 Citations
10 References
Similar Papers

Citations

Publications citing this paper.

References

Publications referenced by this paper.
Showing 1-10 of 10 references

Punishing protestations of innocence: Denying responsibility and its consequences

  • D. Givelber
  • American Criminal Law Review,
  • 2000
Highly Influential
4 Excerpts

Plea bargaining outside the shadow of a trial

  • K. S. Bordens
  • Harvard Law Review,
  • 2004
Highly Influential
3 Excerpts

The problem of false confessions in the post-DNA world

  • S. A. Drizin, R. A. Leo
  • North Carolina Law Review,
  • 2004
1 Excerpt

The plea bargaining process from the defendant’s perspective: A field investigation

  • J. Bassett
  • Basic and Applied Social Psychology,
  • 1985
1 Excerpt

The effects of likelihood of conviction , threatened punishment , and assumed role on mock plea bargaining decisions

  • K. S. Bordens, J. Bassett
  • Basic and Applied Social Psychology
  • 1984

Similar Papers

Loading similar papers…