Plants compared to animals: the broadest comparative study of development.

Abstract

If the last common ancestor of plants and animals was unicellular, comparison of the developmental mechanisms of plants and animals would show that development was independently invented in each lineage. And if this is the case, comparison of plant and animal developmental processes would give us a truly comparative study of development, which comparisons merely among animals, or merely among plants, do not-because in each of these lineages, the fundamental mechanisms are similar by descent. Evidence from studies of developmental mechanisms in both kingdoms, and data from genome-sequencing projects, indicate that development evolved independently in the lineages leading to plants and to animals.

050100'03'05'07'09'11'13'15'17
Citations per Year

673 Citations

Semantic Scholar estimates that this publication has 673 citations based on the available data.

See our FAQ for additional information.

Cite this paper

@article{Meyerowitz2002PlantsCT, title={Plants compared to animals: the broadest comparative study of development.}, author={Elliot M. Meyerowitz}, journal={Science}, year={2002}, volume={295 5559}, pages={1482-5} }