Plan S in Latin America: A Precautionary Note

@article{Debat2019PlanSI,
  title={Plan S in Latin America: A Precautionary Note},
  author={Humberto Julio Debat and Dominique Babini},
  journal={Scholarly and Research Communication},
  year={2019}
}
  • H. Debat, D. Babini
  • Published 1 July 2019
  • Political Science
  • Scholarly and Research Communication
Background  Latin America has historically led a vital and open access movement and leads the worldwide region with the adoption of wider open access practices. Argentina has expressed its commitment to join Plan S, an initiative from a European consortium of research funders with a mandate to promote the open access publishing of scientific outputs. Analysis  This opinion article suggests that the potential adhesion of Argentina or other Latin American nations to Plan S ignores the reality… 
Evaluating institutional open access performance: Methodology, challenges and assessment
TLDR
A minimum reporting standard is proposed and a large-scale analysis of open access progress across 1,207 institutions world-wide that shows substantial progress being made is presented, detects responses that coincide with policy and funding interventions and presents a top-100 of global universities.
Ciencia abierta: un modelo con piezas por encajar
TLDR
Despite the excellent progress in open access and remarkable sharing of research data and respectable use of preprints, little progress has been made in defining and establishing new metrics and new evaluation models, even though they are a key element to incentivize the expansion of Open Science in all disciplines.
Evaluating the impact of open access policies on research institutions
TLDR
It was found that, in 2017, the top-performing universities published around 80–90% of their research open access, and that publisher-mediated (gold) open access was popular in Latin American and African universities, whereas the growth of open access in Europe and North America has mostly been driven by repositories.
Government AI Readiness Meta-Analysis for Latin America And The Caribbean
TLDR
Current issues with existing evaluation criteria for AI readiness are discussed and factors and considerations essential to LAC countries as they embrace the AI revolution are expanded.
Plan S en América Latina: una nota de precaución
El Plan S es una iniciativa de un consorcio europeo de financiadores de investigacion orientada a exigir la publicacion en acceso abierto de los resultados de la investigacion financiados por fondos
Transformative agreements: Six myths, busted: Lessons learned
Transformative agreement (TA) is an umbrella term used to describe contracts between institutions and publishers intended to transform the current, primarily subscription-based, journal publishing
Journal editors and journal indexes: Internationalization pressures in the semi‐periphery of the world of science
TLDR
The article highlights the current tensions that indexation brings for the journals and some strategies to cope with them, the negotiation processes with their traditional audiences, and the conflicts that emerge in the current internationalization processes led by international scientific indexes.
On the geopolitics of academic publishing: the mislocated centers of scholarly communication
ABSTRACT Knowledge production is an important factor in establishing the geopolitical position of countries. In the recent heated discussion on predatory publishing, the geopolitical dimension of
The pricing of open access journals: Diverse niches and sources of value in academic publishing
TLDR
Analyzes the Directory of Open Access Journals to identify characteristics of OA academic journals related to the adoption of article processing charge (APC)-based business models, as well as the price points of journals that charge APCs.
...
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 87 REFERENCES
Open Access in Latin America: a Paragon for the Rest of the World
SciELO is a remarkable decentralized publishing platform harboring over 1,200 peer-reviewed journals from fifteen countries located in four continents South America. Central-North America, Europe and
Will Plan S put learned societies in jeopardy?
TLDR
The European Union and European Research Council, together with 13 European research funding organizations and 3 charitable foundations, have now accelerated the pace of change, with their Plan S, which will require researchers receiving funds from these organizations from 2020 to publish their work in open access journals and on platforms that are compliant with the rules of Plan S.
Latin American science is meant to be open access
TLDR
The reasons behind the emergence of OA in the region are summarized, details and data about the most relevant initiatives are offered and some of the current challenges to keep advancing in this arena are discussed.
Plan S: Unrealistic capped fee structure
TLDR
The developers of Plan S should seek closer relations with scientific societies and help to strengthen society-backed publication venues to achieve truly affordable and open scientific publication strategies.
Plan S en América Latina: una nota de precaución
El Plan S es una iniciativa de un consorcio europeo de financiadores de investigacion orientada a exigir la publicacion en acceso abierto de los resultados de la investigacion financiados por fondos
Scientific societies worry about threat from Plan S.
TLDR
Nonprofit societies worry that an alternative supported by Plan S—allowing grantees to publish in journals that offer immediate open access and charge authors to publish there—will force them to publish more articles to maintain income, potentially lowering quality.
Assessing the size of the affordability problem in scholarly publishing
For many decades, the hyperinflation of subscription prices for scholarly journals have concerned scholarly institutions. After years of fruitless efforts to solve this “serials crisis”, open access
Few Open Access Journals Are Compliant with Plan S
TLDR
It is concluded that a large majority of open access journals are not Plan S-compliant, and that it is small publishers in the humanities and social sciences not charging article processing charges (APC) that will face the largest challenge with becoming compliant.
A proposal for the future of scientific publishing in the life sciences
TLDR
A "publish first, curate second” approach with the following features would be a strong alternative: authors decide when and what to publish; peer review reports are published; and curation occurs after publication, incorporating community feedback and expert judgment to select articles for target audiences and to evaluate whether scientific work has stood the test of time.
The Oligopoly of Academic Publishers in the Digital Era
TLDR
Analysis of 45 million documents indexed in the Web of Science over the period 1973-2013 shows that in both natural and medical sciences (NMS) and social sciences and humanities, Reed-Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Springer, and Taylor & Francis increased their share of the published output, especially since the advent of the digital era (mid-1990s).
...
...