Pivotal Deterrence and the Kosovo War: Why the Holbrooke Agreement Failed
@article{Crawford2001PivotalDA, title={Pivotal Deterrence and the Kosovo War: Why the Holbrooke Agreement Failed}, author={T. Crawford}, journal={Political Science Quarterly}, year={2001}, volume={116}, pages={499-523} }
Debate rages over whether the North Atlantic Treaty Organization's (NATO) air war against Serbia was a success or failure.1 But one thing is certain: that war resulted from a prior failure of NATO policy. The goal was to prevent the escalation of conflict and to achieve a political settlement that got "Serbia out of Kosovo, not Kosovo out of Serbia," without having to use force.2 As intended, the Kosovo Liberation Army's (KLA) insurgency in Kosovo had provoked Belgrade's ham-fisted repression… CONTINUE READING
32 Citations
First Do No Harm: Humanitarian Intervention and the Destruction of Yugoslavia
- Political Science
- 2009
- 54
- PDF
Kosovo traumas: How NATO got out of its depth in crisis management operations
- Political Science
- 2019
- PDF
Representation and agency in diplomacy: how Kosovo came to agree to the Rambouillet accords
- Political Science
- 2017
- 7
- PDF
Conflict externalization and the quest for peace: theory and case evidence from Colombia
- Political Science
- 2018
Third-party intervention and escalation in Kosovo: Does moral hazard explain it?
- Sociology
- 2005
- 19
- Highly Influenced