Pitfalls of post-model-selection testing: experimental quantification
@article{Demetrescu2011PitfallsOP, title={Pitfalls of post-model-selection testing: experimental quantification}, author={Matei Demetrescu and Uwe Hassler and Vladimir Kuzin}, journal={Empirical Economics}, year={2011}, volume={40}, pages={359-372} }
Traditional specification testing does not always improve subsequent inference. We demonstrate by means of computer experiments under which circumstances, and how severely, data-driven model selection can destroy the size properties of subsequent parameter tests, if they are used without adjusting for the model-selection step. The investigated models are representative of macroeconometric and microeconometric workhorses. The model selection procedures include information criteria as well as… CONTINUE READING
Citations
Publications citing this paper.
SHOWING 1-10 OF 11 CITATIONS
Testing the fractionally integrated hypothesis using M estimation: With an application to stock market volatility
VIEW 8 EXCERPTS
CITES BACKGROUND & METHODS
How to Use Model Confidence Sets for Forecasting and Impulse Response Estimation and the Value of Model Averaging
VIEW 7 EXCERPTS
CITES METHODS & BACKGROUND
HIGHLY INFLUENCED
Detecting multiple breaks in long memory the case of U.S. inflation
VIEW 10 EXCERPTS
CITES BACKGROUND & METHODS
Quantile Regression for Long Memory Testing: A Case of Realized Volatility
VIEW 1 EXCERPT
CITES METHODS
Flat Prices, Cell Phone Base Stations, and Network Structure: An Instrumental Variable Approach to Endogenous Locations
VIEW 1 EXCERPT
CITES BACKGROUND
Using invalid instruments on purpose: Focused moment selection and averaging for GMM
VIEW 3 EXCERPTS
CITES METHODS & BACKGROUND
Accounting for Model Uncertainty in Linear Mixed-Effects Models
VIEW 1 EXCERPT
CITES RESULTS