Piaget's epistemic subject and science education: Epistemological vs. psychological issues

  title={Piaget's epistemic subject and science education: Epistemological vs. psychological issues},
  author={Richard F. Kitchener},
  journal={Science \& Education},
Many individuals claim that Piaget's theory of cognitive development is empirically false or substantially disconfirmed by empirical research. Although there is substance to such a claim, any such conclusion must address three increasingly problematic issues about the possibility of providing an empirical test of Piaget's genetic epistemology: (1) the empirical underdetermination of theory by empirical evidence, (2) the empirical difficulty of testing competence-type explanations, and (3) the… Expand
The Role of Idealization in Science and Its Implications for Science Education
The main objective of this article is to study the role of empirical evidence in the interpretation of psychological and epistemological aspects of Piagetian theory. According to GalileanExpand
Genetic Epistemology, a Universalist Approach to the History of Science
GER Lloyd discerns two conflicting hypotheses concerning human cognition: cross-cultural universality and cultural relativity. The history of science is one discipline among many activelyExpand
The epistemological significance of Piaget’s developmental stages: a Lakatosian interpretation
Abstract A review of the literature shows that there is considerable debate as to the epistemological significance of Piaget’s developmental stages. Many of the critics have rejected Piaget’s theoryExpand
“progressive problemshifts” between different research programs in science education: A lakatosian perspective
Given the importance of epistemology and philosophy of science, the Lakatos (1970) methodology is particularly suited to evaluate competing research programs in science education. This article hasExpand
Epistemological beliefs of students and teachers about the nature of science: from ‘baconian inductive ascent’ to the ‘irrelevance’ of scientific laws
The main objectives of this study are to: (a) to investigate students' and teachers' beliefs about the nature of science; (b) to explore the relationship among the students' and teachers' beliefs;Expand
Constructivism: Defense or a Continual Critical Appraisal A Response to Gil-Pérez et al.
This commentary is a critical appraisal of Gil-Pérez et al.'s (2002) conceptualization of constructivism. It is argued that the following aspects of their presentation are problematic: (a) AlthoughExpand
Competing research programs in science education: A Lakatosian interpretation
The main objective of this article is to analyse the concept-learning—Alternative Conceptions Movement (ACM)—and the developmental—Piagetian School (PS)—perspectives in science education within aExpand
Feyerabend’s Counterinduction and Science Textbooks
According to Feyerabend (1970a) most scientific theories are not consistent with all known facts (p. 43). Consequently, if we tell students to accept only those theories which are consistent with theExpand
English secondary students’ thinking about the status of scientific theories: consistent, comprehensive, coherent and extensively evidenced explanations of aspects of the natural world – or just ‘an idea someone has’
Teaching about the nature of science (NOS) is seen as a priority for science education in many national contexts. The present paper focuses on one central issue in learning about NOS: understandingExpand
Is Cognitive Science Relevant to Teaching
This paper is concerned with the application of cognitive science to the problems of pedagogy. My discussion bears on teaching generally but I give some emphasis to the case of science education asExpand


Role of the epistemic subject in Piaget's genetic epistemology and its importance for science education
According to Piaget, a fundamental epistemological distinction must be made between the psychological and the epistemic subject. The epistemic subject is studied by the genetic epistemologist whoExpand
The role of competence theories in cognitive psychology
  • Z. Pylyshyn
  • Psychology, Medicine
  • Journal of psycholinguistic research
  • 1973
This paper discusses several common misunderstandings regarding theories of competence and argues that the claim of the psychological reality of amechanism is only appropriate when the mechanism accounts parsimoniously for the widest possible range of empirical phenomena. Expand
Summary. AS a result of eight years' experience of Piagetian research and subsequent work as a practising psychologist, certain aspects of Piaget's theories are criticised. In particular theExpand
Justification, Discovery and the Naturalizing of Epistemology
Reichenbach's well-known distinction between the context of discovery and the context of justification has recently come under attack from several quarters. In this paper I attempt to reconsider theExpand
Piagetian psychology and education: time for revision.
It is concluded that Piaget's search for generalities in cognitive development has been unsuccessful, and that an approach based upon a skill-integration model might be more profitable. Expand
The Computer Revolution in Philosophy: Philosophy, Science, and Models of Mind
The book presented deep important connections between Artificial Intelligence and Philosophy, based partly on an argument that both philosophy and science are primarily concerned with identifying andExpand
Epistemology and Cognition
Introduction Part I: Theoretical Foundations 1. The Elements of Epistemology 2. Skepticism 3. Knowledge 4. Justification: A Rule Framework 5. Justification and Reliability 6. Problem Solving, Power,Expand
The stage question in cognitive-developmental theory
The term “stage” appears to be used in three general senses in theories of behavioral development: ( a ) as a metaphor: ( b ) as a description of behaviors that undergo age change; ( c ) as anExpand
Some connections between epistemology and cognitive psychology
Abstract This is a prolegomenon to a comprehensive account of the relation between epistemology and experimental cognitive psychology (ECP). It provides a clarification of some of the crucial ways inExpand
The operational analysis of psychological terms.
The major contributions of operationism have been negative, largely because operationists failed to distinguish logical theories of reference from empirical accounts of language. Behaviorism neverExpand