• DOI:10.1086/297495
• Corpus ID: 85888916

Physiological and Anatomical Responses to Water Deficits in the Cam Epiphyte Tillandsia ionantha (Bromeliaceae)

@article{Nowak1997PhysiologicalAA,
  title={Physiological and Anatomical Responses to Water Deficits in the Cam Epiphyte Tillandsia ionantha (Bromeliaceae)},
  author={Edwin J. Nowak and Craig Edwin Martin},
  journal={International Journal of Plant Sciences},
  year={1997},
  volume={158},
  pages={818 - 826}
}

• E. Nowak, C. Martin
• Published 1 November 1997
• Environmental Science
• International Journal of Plant Sciences

Although physiological responses to drought have been examined in several species of epiphytic bromeliads, few have included a comprehensive methodological approach to the study of the carbon and water relations of a single species undergoing drought stress. Thus, physiological and anatomical responses to an imposed drought treatment were examined in the atmospheric Crassulacean acid metabolism (CAM) epiphyte Tillandsia ionantha. From 0 through 20 d without water, nocturnal malic acid accumulation and CO2 uptake rates did not change despite a 17% reduction in relative water content. In addition, water potentials averaged -0.40 MPa and, unlike leaf water content, did not decline. The avoidance of further declines in leaf water content was attributed to the restriction of stomatal opening to the night (a characteristic feature of CAM), to low stomatal densities and small stomatal pores, and to a thick boundary layer resulting from a dense foliar trichome cover. The maintenance of high physiological activity during the first 20 d of the drought treatment was most likely a result of the high water potentials in the chlorenchyma, which were attributed, in part, to water movement from the water-storage parenchyma (= "hydrenchyma") to the chlorenchyma. Nocturnal malic acid accumulation and the rate of net CO2 exchange declined in a linear fashion from 30 to 60 d without water, as did leaf water potential and osmotic potential. During this time, CO2 recycling increased from ca. 20% to nearly 75%. Though declining throughout this later stage of the drought treatment, metabolic activity remained relatively high, possibly as a result of the observed osmotic adjustment as well as a potentially high cell wall elasticity.