• Corpus ID: 235898898

Physics to the rescue?

  title={Physics to the rescue?},
  author={Andrea Saltelli and Monica Di Fiore and Francesco Span{\`o}},
A vast body of literature addresses the complex nature of science’s reproducibility crisis. In contrast with this perceived complexity, some recent papers from the discipline of physics suggests that irreproducibility does not point to a systemic crisis, but is, on the contrary, a sign that the science system works properly. These works, while acknowledging the difference between physics and other disciplines mired in the reproducibility crisis, hint that all disciplines could learn from… 


What is science’s crisis really about?
In response to the challenges of policy issues of risk and the environment, a new type of science -‘post-normal’- is emerging. This is analysed in contrast to traditional problem-solving strategies,
From Little Science to Big Science
In Little Science, Big Science (1963), Derek J. de Solla Price undertook a sociology of science that dealt with the growth and changing shape of scientific publishing and the social organization of
“Positive” Results Increase Down the Hierarchy of the Sciences
These results support the scientific status of the social sciences against claims that they are completely subjective, by showing that, when they adopt a scientific approach to discovery, they differ from the natural sciences only by a matter of degree.
Crisis or self-correction: Rethinking media narratives about the well-being of science
  • K. Jamieson
  • Education
    Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • 2018
This essay outlines ways in which those who communicate science can more accurately convey its investigatory process, self-correcting norms, and remedial actions, without in the process legitimizing an unwarranted “science is broken/in crisis” narrative.
Why science’s crisis should not become a political battling ground
The natural selection of bad science
A 60-year meta-analysis of statistical power in the behavioural sciences is presented and it is shown that power has not improved despite repeated demonstrations of the necessity of increasing power, and that replication slows but does not stop the process of methodological deterioration.
Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science
A large-scale assessment suggests that experimental reproducibility in psychology leaves a lot to be desired, and correlational tests suggest that replication success was better predicted by the strength of original evidence than by characteristics of the original and replication teams.