• DOI:10.1111/J.1365-2427.2007.01812.X
• Corpus ID: 98812233

Physicochemical stream bed characteristics and recruitment of the freshwater pearl mussel (Margaritifera margaritifera)

@article{Geist2007PhysicochemicalSB,
  title={Physicochemical stream bed characteristics and recruitment of the freshwater pearl mussel (Margaritifera margaritifera)},
  author={Juergen Geist and Karl Auerswald},
  journal={Freshwater Biology},
  year={2007},
  volume={52},
  pages={2299-2316}
}

• J. Geist, K. Auerswald
• Published 1 December 2007
• Environmental Science
• Freshwater Biology

SUMMARY 1. The freshwater pearl mussel (Margaritifera margaritifera) is endangered and of conservation importance. We used its survival/mortality during the critical post-parasitic phase as a biological indicator for the habitat quality of the stream substratum. 2. We established and tested biological, physical and chemical methods of assessing the stream bed in 26 streams from seven European countries. We analysed penetration resistance, texture, the concentrations and ratios of C, N, S, P, Fe, Mn in fine material <100 lm, and redox, pH and electric conductivity at the surface and at 5 and 10 cm into the substratum. 3. Sites with high stream bed quality (promoting pearl mussel populations with good juvenile recruitment) had coarser and better sorted substrata with significantly lower quantities of fines, and a higher Mn concentration in the fines, than poor quality sites. Redox potential (Eh) at sites without recruitment differed markedly between the freeflowing water at the surface and at 5 and 10 cm in the bed, whereas no differences were detectable at good quality sites. This was also true of electric conductivity and, to a lesser extent, pH. The stream bed at sites lacking pearl mussel recruitment had a more variable and higher penetration resistance, indicating clogging of the interstitial macropore system by the deposition of mud and compaction of the stream bed. 4. Our results show that habitat quality for pearl mussels depends strongly on the exchange between the surface and the interstices, which is governed by physicochemical characteristics of the stream substratum. Combined measurements of penetration resistance, depth gradients of Eh and texture were most suitable for assessing stream bed quality, while water chemistry was insufficient because of the decoupling of interstitial and free-flowing water at poor quality sites.