Physical and Social Kinship

  title={Physical and Social Kinship},
  author={James A. Barnes},
  journal={Philosophy of Science},
  pages={296 - 299}
  • J. A. Barnes
  • Published 1 July 1961
  • Psychology
  • Philosophy of Science
Although this note is prompted by the recent exchange between Gellner [2], [3] and Needham [4], I shall ignore the issues raised by Gellner's specification for an ideal language. I am concerned here only with Needham's statement that "biology is one matter and descent is quite another, of a different order' which, it will be remembered, Gellner treats as Needham's first error. I write under a sense of obligation, for I discussed this matter with Gellner in 1955 while he was preparing his first… 

Physical and Social Facts in Anthropology

In his recent paper [5] Gellner singles me out for special comment and some reply is called for. He attributes to me several propositions which he says I made in my note on 'Physical and social

What is Kinship

Author(s): Read, Dwight W | Abstract: The anthropologist David Schneider suggested two decades ago that we need to consider a hypothesis other than the claim of a universal grid underlying all

Aspects of a formalist theory of kinship

I shall assume the general relevance of genealogy for kinship on the basis of my earlier paper (Lehman, 1993). I shall then proceed, first, to examine some further important formal properties of

Ancient Society and Morgan's Kinship Theory 100 Years After [and Comments and Reply]

The synchronic, antievolutionary approach to kinship has made it impossible to grasp its nature and define it adequately. Understanding of the phenomenon is tobe found in the implications of Morgan's

From the social to the symbolic equation: the progress of idealism in contemporary anthropological representations of kinship, marriage, and the family

This is the second paper of a trilogy, in which I investigate the development of anthropological definitions of kinship, marriage and the family, assess their limitations for the comparative study of

Kinship and Cognition: Genealogy and the Meaning of Kinship Terms

Anthropologists concerned with formal semantic analysis have overwhelmingly accepted the notion that the referential universe of kinship terms is genealogically constrained, while those concerned

The Fall of Kinship: Towards an Epidemiological Explanation

Kinship used to be described as what anthropologists do. Today, many might well say that it is what anthropologists do not do. One possible explanation is that the notion of kinship fell off

Kinship, Marriage, and the Family: An Operational Approach

  • M. Verdon
  • Psychology
    American Journal of Sociology
  • 1981
The concepts used in the study of social organizational (such as kinship, marriage, and the family) are "secondary" concepts insofar as they are derived from a more implicit, more fundamental notion

Kinship Studies: Neoclassicism and New Wave. A Critical Review

In the last few years in France and the Anglophone countries, the subject of kinship has been eliciting new interest and new analyses. Four recently published works (three in French, one in

Gellner's Ideal Kinship Language And the Connection between Biological And Social Relatedness

Gellner’s concept of an ideal kinship language anticipated later developments in methods for recording kinship connections, and also sparked a controversy about the relation between biological and



Descent Systems and Ideal Language

This note is written in response to Gellner's "Ideal Language and Kinship Structure" (1).1 In that article he tries to shed some light on the notion of an ideal language by constructing in outline an

Ideal Language and Kinship Structure

This paper is inter-disciplinary. Its disadvantage is that the author is not sufficiently conversant with the disciplines it is inter. He may however, like Lord Wavell, claim that at least the thread

The concept of kinship

  • Philosophy of Science, 27, 1960, pp. 187-204.
  • 1960

Ifugao law

  • University of California publications in American archaeology and ethnology, 15, 1919, pp. 1-186.
  • 1919