Phylogenomics Revives Traditional Views on Deep Animal Relationships

@article{Philippe2009PhylogenomicsRT,
  title={Phylogenomics Revives Traditional Views on Deep Animal Relationships},
  author={Herv{\'e} Philippe and Romain Derelle and Philippe Lopez and Kerstin Pick and Carole Borchiellini and Nicole Boury‐Esnault and Jean Vacelet and Emmanuelle Renard and Evelyn Houliston and Eric Qu{\'e}innec and Corinne Da Silva and Patrick Wincker and Herv{\'e} Le Guyader and Sally P. Leys and Daniel J. Jackson and Fabian Schreiber and Dirk Erpenbeck and Burkhard Morgenstern and Gert W{\"o}rheide and Micha{\"e}l Manuel},
  journal={Current Biology},
  year={2009},
  volume={19},
  pages={706-712}
}

Figures from this paper

Placozoans are eumetazoans related to Cnidaria

It is necessary to reconsider the homology of eumetazoan traits not only between ctenophores and bilaterians, but also between cnidarians and bizards, as well as between placozoans and poriferans.

Employing Phylogenomics to Resolve the Relationships among Cnidarians, Ctenophores, Sponges, Placozoans, and Bilaterians.

Past phylogenomic studies and potential causes of systematic error are reviewed in an effort to identify areas that can be improved in future studies and caution against dismissing novel hypotheses merely because they conflict with historical viewpoints of animal evolution.

Phylogenomic Analyses Support Traditional Relationships within Cnidaria

Cnidaria, the sister group to Bilateria, is a highly diverse group of animals in terms of morphology, lifecycles, ecology, and development. How this diversity originated and evolved is not well

A Look Back Over 20 Years of Evo-Devo Studies on Sponges: A Challenged View of Urmetazoa

This chapter focuses on the evo-devo approaches applied to Porifera and how the data have changed the authors' view of these uncommon animals and how it challenges previous concepts of the last common metazoan ancestor.

The phylogenetic position of ctenophores and the origin(s) of nervous systems

It is argued that characters like neuropeptide signaling, ciliary photoreceptors, gap junctions and presynaptic molecules are consistent with a shared ancestry of nervous systems, however, that phylogenetic-tree construction artifacts may have placed ctenophores too deep in the metazoan tree.

Putting Animals in their Place within a Context of Eukaryotic Innovations

The current understanding of animal evolutionary relationships is reviewed, including which of the basal metazoan phyla (Porifera, Placozoa, Cnidaria, or Ctenophora) is basal-most, the branching order of the three major lineages of Arthropoda, the relationships within Lophotrochozoa, and the placement of several so-called minor groups such as Chaetognatha.

Extracting phylogenetic signal and accounting for bias in whole-genome data sets supports the Ctenophora as sister to remaining Metazoa

The phylogeny supports the still-controversial position of ctenophores as sister group to all other metazoans and provides a workflow and computational tools for minimizing systematic bias in genome-based phylogenetic analyses.

Insights into bilaterian evolution from three spiralian

Current genomic perspectives on animal diversity neglect two prominent phyla, the molluscs and annelids, that together account for nearly one-third of known marine species and are important both

Higher-level metazoan relationships: recent progress and remaining questions

The relationships of the five main metazoan lineages—Porifera, Ctenophora, Placozoa, Cnidaria and Bilateria—remain subject to conflicting topologies according to different taxonomic samples and analytical approaches.
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 48 REFERENCES

Broad phylogenomic sampling improves resolution of the animal tree of life

This data reinforce several previously identified clades that split deeply in the animal tree, unambiguously resolve multiple long-standing issues for which there was strong conflicting support in earlier studies with less data, and provide molecular support for the monophyly of molluscs, a group long recognized by morphologists.

Poriferan paraphyly and its implications for Precambrian palaeobiology

It is demonstrated, in accordance with previous molecular studies, that sponges are paraphyletic, and that calcisponge are more closely related to eumetazoans than they are to demosponges.

Concatenated Analysis Sheds Light on Early Metazoan Evolution and Fuels a Modern “Urmetazoon” Hypothesis

The sum of morphological evidence, the secondary structure of mitochondrial ribosomal genes, and molecular sequence data from mitochondrial and nuclear genes that amass over 9,400 phylogenetically informative characters from 24 to 73 taxa are analyzed to provide evidence that Placozoa are basal relative to all other diploblast phyla and spark a modernized “urmetazoon” hypothesis.

Sponge paraphyly and the origin of Metazoa

The polymerase chain reaction is used to amplify almost the entire nucleic acid sequence of the 18S rDNA from several hexactinellid, demosponge and calcareous sponge species to suggest that sponges are paraphyletic, the Calcarea being more related to monophyletic Eumetazoa than to the siliceous spongees.

Improvement of molecular phylogenetic inference and the phylogeny of Bilateria

The sister-group relationship of Platyhelminthes and Annelida to the exclusion of Mollusca, contradicting the Neotrochozoa hypothesis, and, with a lower statistical support, the paraphyly of Deuterostomia are discussed in an evo–devo framework.

Multigene analyses of bilaterian animals corroborate the monophyly of Ecdysozoa, Lophotrochozoa, and Protostomia.

This study demonstrates that the incongruences observed between rRNA and multigene analyses were indeed due to long-branch attraction artifacts, illustrating the enormous impact of systematic biases on phylogenomic studies and suggests that urochordates are more closely related to vertebrates than are cephalochordates.

Early evolution of symmetry and polarity in metazoan body plans.

Phylogeny and evolution of glass sponges (porifera, hexactinellida).

This rDNA phylogeny agrees well with the traditional classification and a previously proposed phylogenetic system, which ascribes to a more informative morphology in Hexactinellida, and recovers Porifera as monophyletic, although support for this clade is low under paired-sites models.

Animal phylogeny and the ancestry of bilaterians: inferences from morphology and 18S rDNA gene sequences

Because chaetognaths and lophophorates, taxa traditionally allied with deuterostomes, occupy basal positions within their respective protostomian clades, deuterstomy most likely represents a suite of characters plesiomorphic for bilaterians.