Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature

@article{Greene1979PhilosophyAT,
  title={Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature},
  author={Robert A. Greene and R. Rorty},
  journal={Mln},
  year={1979},
  volume={95},
  pages={1387}
}
"Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature" hit the philosophical world like a bombshell. Richard Rorty, a Princeton professor who had contributed to the analytic tradition in philosophy, was now attempting to shrug off all the central problems with which it had long been preoccupied. After publication, the Press was barely able to keep up with demand, and the book has since gone on to become one of its all-time best-sellers in philosophy. Rorty argued that, beginning in the seventeenth century… Expand
Buchdahl and Rorty on Kant and the History of Philosophy
Richard Rorty’s recent challenges to the professional philosopher flow from his distinctive interpretation of the modern tradition. He argues that its deepest and most questionable presupposition isExpand
Shadow History in Philosophy
1. The shadows of great philosophers, elongated and distorted, extend far into the future. They constitute a shadow history o f philosophy that is more influential than the history o f philosophyExpand
Richard Rorty's Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature: an existential critique
ConclusionSeeing philosophy as conversation with a number of fruitful avenues of discourse, Rorty seems to be caught in limbo, unwilling to follow through or commit himself to any particular line ofExpand
A Neo-Pragmatist Approach to the Theory of Knowledge
For many, analytic philosophy is taking a new turn in the past fifty years or so. Donald Davidson considers himself participating a philosophical revolution against what he calls ”subjectivism”;Expand
Scientism, pragmatism, and the fate of philosophy
I assume here, what I have argued elsewhere, that Rorty's dissolution of the Tradition is in the main well taken. Foundationalist epistemologically based or metaphysically oriented philosophy,Expand
Naturalism in the Philosophy of Mind
The contrast between the space of reasons and the realm of law to which Sellars implicitly appeals was not available before modern times. Ancient philosophers didn't feel a tension between the ideaExpand
On Not Deconstructing the Difference between Literature and Philosophy
More than a quarter of a century ago J. L. Austin warned of the need "to abandon old habits of Gleichschaltung, the deeply ingrained worship of tidy-looking dichotomies."1 On the face of it thisExpand
Antifoundational thought and the sociology of knowledge: The case of Karl Mannheim
In Philosophy and the Mirror o f Nature (1979) Richard Rorty identifies a common theme that unites a number of influential twentieth century philosophers. He defines this theme as the rejection ofExpand
Rorty, Phenomenology and Transcendental Philosophy
Richard Rorty’s book1 bridges the gap, much talked about in the English-speaking philosophical world, between “Analytic philosophy” and “Continental philosophy” by showing, first, that they bothExpand
On Edification and Cultural Conversation: A Critique of Rorty
Being a philosopher today in the wake of the shipwreck of Neo-Kantianism and other such foundationalist ventures is for Richard Rorty a matter of entering into a cultural conversation. The aim ofExpand
...
1
2
3
4
5
...