Philosophical Thought Experiments as Excercises in Conceptual Analysis

@inproceedings{Nimtz2012PhilosophicalTE,
  title={Philosophical Thought Experiments as Excercises in Conceptual Analysis},
  author={Christian Nimtz},
  year={2012}
}
In the paper, I defend the viability and importance of conceptual analysis to philosophical inquiry. My argument proceeds in two steps. In a first step, I argue that we rely on the notions guiding how we do and would apply our terms in order to evaluate the counterfactual conditionals we find at the heart of philosophical thought-experiments. In a second step, I argue that our notions determine what the relevant terms mean in our mouth. In order to defend the resulting neodescriptivist… CONTINUE READING

From This Paper

Topics from this paper.

Citations

Publications citing this paper.
Showing 1-2 of 2 extracted citations

References

Publications referenced by this paper.
Showing 1-10 of 42 references

Is Justified True Belief Knowledge?

  • E. L. Gettier
  • Analysis
  • 1963
Highly Influential
4 Excerpts

Modal Knowledge and Thought Experiments.

  • Häggqvist, Sören
  • In Kompa/Nimtz/Suhm (eds.)
  • 2009

A New Rationalism? Intuitions, Modal Knowledge, and the Analysis of Concepts

  • Nimtz, Christian.
  • Unpublished manuscript. (Habilitationsschrift.)
  • 2007

On Not Forgetting the Epistemology of Names.

  • Jackson, Frank
  • Grazer Philosophische Studien
  • 2007

Reference and Description from the Descriptivists

  • Jackson, Frank
  • Corner.” Philosophical Books
  • 2007

The Philosophy of Philosophy

  • Williamson, Timothy.
  • Oxford: Blackwell.
  • 2007

Similar Papers

Loading similar papers…