Phases of German Civil Procedure II

@article{Kaplan1958PhasesOG,
  title={Phases of German Civil Procedure II},
  author={Benjamin J. Kaplan and Arthur Taylor von Mehren and Rudolf Schaefer},
  journal={Harvard Law Review},
  year={1958},
  volume={71},
  pages={1193}
}
The Judicial Assessment of Expert Evidence
Introduction 1. General epistemological issues 2. Expert evidence as a special case for judicial assessment 3. Making sense of expert disagreement 4. Non-epistemological factors in determining the
The Rationale for Motions in the Design of Adjudication
The conduct of adjudication is often influenced by motions—requests made by litigants to modify the course of adjudication. The question studied in this article is why adjudication should be designed
The Rationale for Motions in the Design of Adjudication
A Counterintuitive Efficiency Divide Between Common Law and Civil Law: Rules and Structures of Civil Procedure in Eight Developed or Newly Industrialized Countries
Substantive law such as contract law, corporate law and securities law would be dead letter as mere “law on the books” without efficient procedures in judicial or alternative structures offering
Institutional convergence and competition
Evidence collected from 64 countries confirms the comparative law theory of a convergence between common law and civil law. Yet, institutional competition between the two legal traditions continues
Interdisciplinary Issues in Comparing Common Law and Civil Law
The “comparative quality” of common law and civil law has become an issue of policy, since La Porta, Lopes-de-Silanes, Shleifer and Vishny (LLSV) developed their “legal origins theory” (LOT)
Financial Crisis as a Catalyst of Legal Reforms: The Case of Asia
This paper discusses how financial crises in emerging Asia and Japan worked as catalysts for legal reforms. The responses of six Asian countries with different legal histories to financial crises
How Legal Representation Affects Case Outcomes: An Empirical Perspective from Taiwan
Since the late 1980s, interdisciplinary scholars have conducted several empirical studies to examine to what extent legal representation affects case outcomes. Yet most of these empirical endeavors
Legal Versus Normative Incentives Under Judicial Error
We analyze the complementarity between legal incentives (the threat of being held liable for damages) and normative incentives (the fear of social disapproval or stigma) in situations where instances
...
1
2
...