• DOI:10.1111/jep.13772
• Corpus ID: 252566067

Perspectives of (/memorandum for) systems thinking on COVID‐19 pandemic and pathology

@article{Tretter2022PerspectivesO,
  title={Perspectives of (/memorandum for) systems thinking on COVID‐19 pandemic and pathology},
  author={Felix Tretter and Eva M. J. Peters and Joachim P. Sturmberg and Jeanette M Bennett and Eberhard Voit and Johannes W Dietrich and Gary R Smith and Wolfram Weckwerth and Zvi Grossman and Olaf Wolkenhauer and James A. Marcum},
  journal={Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice},
  year={2022}
}

• F. Tretter, E. Peters, +8 authors J. Marcum
• Published 28 September 2022
• Medicine
• Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice

Abstract Is data‐driven analysis sufficient for understanding the COVID‐19 pandemic and for justifying public health regulations? In this paper, we argue that such analysis is insufficient. Rather what is needed is the identification and implementation of over‐arching hypothesis‐related and/or theory‐based rationales to conduct effective SARS‐CoV2/COVID‐19 (Corona) research. To that end, we analyse and compare several published recommendations for conceptual and methodological frameworks in medical research (e.g., public health, preventive medicine and health promotion) to current research approaches in medical Corona research. Although there were several efforts published in the literature to develop integrative conceptual frameworks before the COVID‐19 pandemic, such as social ecology for public health issues and systems thinking in health care, only a few attempts to utilize these concepts can be found in medical Corona research. For this reason, we propose nested and integrative systemic modelling approaches to understand Corona pandemic and Corona pathology. We conclude that institutional efforts for knowledge integration and systemic thinking, but also for integrated science, are urgently needed to avoid or mitigate future pandemics and to resolve infection pathology.