Perspective: NutriGrade: A Scoring System to Assess and Judge the Meta-Evidence of Randomized Controlled Trials and Cohort Studies in Nutrition Research.

@article{Schwingshackl2016PerspectiveNA,
  title={Perspective: NutriGrade: A Scoring System to Assess and Judge the Meta-Evidence of Randomized Controlled Trials and Cohort Studies in Nutrition Research.},
  author={Lukas Schwingshackl and Sven Knueppel and Carolina Schwedhelm and Georg Friedrich Hoffmann and Benjamin Missbach and Marta Stelmach-Mardas and Stefan Dietrich and Fabian Eichelmann and Evangelos Kontopantelis and Khalid Iqbal and Krasimira Aleksandrova and Stefan Lorkowski and Michael F. Leitzmann and Anja Kroke and H. B{\"o}ing},
  journal={Advances in nutrition},
  year={2016},
  volume={7 6},
  pages={994-1004}
}
The objective of this study was to develop a scoring system (NutriGrade) to evaluate the quality of evidence of randomized controlled trial (RCT) and cohort study meta-analyses in nutrition research, building upon previous tools and expert recommendations. NutriGrade aims to assess the meta-evidence of an association or effect between different nutrition… CONTINUE READING