Personality and job performance: the Big Five revisited.

  title={Personality and job performance: the Big Five revisited.},
  author={Gregory M. Hurtz and John J. Donovan},
  journal={The Journal of applied psychology},
  volume={85 6},
Prior meta-analyses investigating the relation between the Big 5 personality dimensions and job performance have all contained a threat to construct validity, in that much of the data included within these analyses was not derived from actual Big 5 measures. In addition, these reviews did not address the relations between the Big 5 and contextual performance. Therefore, the present study sought to provide a meta-analytic estimate of the criterion-related validity of explicit Big 5 measures for… 

Tables from this paper

Investigating the Uniqueness and Usefulness of Proactive Personality in Organizational Research: A Meta-Analytic Review

Using meta-analysis (283 effect sizes from 122 studies), we extend prior qualitative and quantitative reviews of research on proactive personality in a number of meaningful ways. First, we examine

Relationship of personality to performance motivation: a meta-analytic review.

A meta-analysis of the relationship between the five-factor model of personality and 3 central theories of performance motivation (goal-setting, expectancy, and self-efficacy motivation) indicated that Neuroticism and Conscientiousness were the strongest and most consistent correlates ofperformance motivation across the 3 theoretical perspectives.

Exploring the Mediating Mechanisms in the Personality-Job Performance Relationship

Meta-analytic studies have consistently reported that job performance has a significant relationship with personality traits. However, only a limited number of researches have been conducted to find

Incremental Validity of Person-Organization Fit Over the Big Five Personality Measures

P-O fit predicted the contextual component of overall job performance and was significantly related to two types of employee commitment and had an incremental validity beyond that of the personality measures for predicting some of the outcome variables.

Broad and narrow personality traits for predicting managerial success

Research concerning the relationship between personality and job performance has been largely conducted within the framework of the broad Big Five personality traits (Costa & McCrae, 1992). In

The Impact of Contextual Self‐Ratings and Observer Ratings of Personality on the Personality–Performance Relationship1

This study examined 2 possible ways of increasing the predictive validity of personality measures: using observer (i.e., supervisor and coworker) ratings and work-specific self-ratings of Big Five

Incremental Validity of Character Strengths as Predictors of Job Performance Beyond General Mental Ability and the Big Five

The present study shows that character strengths are relevant predictors of job performance in addition to GMA and other conceptualizations of personality (i.e., the Big Five), and highlights the role of socio-emotional skills, such as character strengths, for the understanding of performance outcomes above and beyond cognitive ability.




Tett, Jackson, and Rothstein (1991) recently presented a meta-analysis of the relationship between personality and job performance. Many of their findings, particularly those pertaining to the Big

Personality dimensions and domains of service performance: A field investigation

Although recent meta-analytic studies have investigated the validity of the “Big Five” domains of personality by classifying pre-existing personality measures into the five dimensions, published

Personality and job performance: Evidence of incremental validity.

It is suggested that personality variables are significant predictors of job performance when carefully matched with the appropriate occupation and organization. The present study investigates the

Predicting Supervisor Ratings of Job Performance Using the NEO Personality Inventory

Abstract The resurging interest in identifying personality predictors of job performance has led researchers to use the five-factor model of personality as an important conceptual tool. Two recent

The Five Factor Model of personality and job performance in the European Community.

  • J. Salgado
  • Psychology
    The Journal of applied psychology
  • 1997
The results indicate that Conscientiousness and Emotional Stability are valid predictors across job criteria and occupational groups, and the remaining factors are valid only for some criteria and for some occupational groups.


This study investigated the relation of the “Big Five” personality dimensions (Extraversion, Emotional Stability, Agreeableness, Conscientiousness, and Openness to Experience) to three job

Five-Factor Model of personality and Performance in Jobs Involving Interpersonal Interactions

In this article, the results of a meta-analysis that investigates the degree to which dimensions of the Five-Factor Model (FFM) of personality are related to performance in jobs involving

Autonomy as a moderator of the relationships between the Big Five personality dimensions and job performance.

In this study we investigated the moderating role of autonomy on the relationships between the Big Five personality dimensions and supervisor ratings of job performance. On the basis of data from 146

Personality and Job Performance in Financial Services Managers

This article presents research in which the Five Factor Model of personality was tested as a predictor of job performance. 125 financial services managers who had enrolled in a potential evaluation

Implications of the multidimensional nature of job performance for the validity of selection tests

Although most studies of criterion-related validity focus on univariate relationships, the complex and multidimensional nature of the performance construct and the widespread use of multiple