Persistent Bias on Wikipedia

@article{Martin2018PersistentBO,
  title={Persistent Bias on Wikipedia},
  author={Brian Martin},
  journal={Social Science Computer Review},
  year={2018},
  volume={36},
  pages={379 - 388}
}
  • Brian Martin
  • Published 1 June 2018
  • Computer Science
  • Social Science Computer Review
Systematically biased editing, persistently maintained, can occur on Wikipedia while nominally following guidelines. Techniques for biasing an entry include deleting positive material, adding negative material, using a one-sided selection of sources, and exaggerating the significance of particular topics. To maintain bias in an entry in the face of resistance, key techniques are reverting edits, selectively invoking Wikipedia rules, and overruling resistant editors. Options for dealing with… Expand
Detecting Biased Statements in Wikipedia
TLDR
A supervised classification approach is proposed, which relies on an automatically created lexicon of bias words, and other syntactical and semantic characteristics of biased statements, and shows that it is able to detect biased statements with an accuracy of 74%. Expand
Neural Based Statement Classification for Biased Language
TLDR
This work proposes an approach that relies on a recurrent neural networks in order to capture the inter-dependencies between words in a phrase that introduced bias, and shows the advantages of a neural based approach over competitors that rely on word lexicons and other hand-crafted features in detecting biased language. Expand
The Good, the Bot, and the Ugly: Problematic Information and Critical Media Literacy in the Postdigital Era
This paper explores Wikipedia bots and problematic information in order to consider implications for cultivating students’ critical media literacy. While we recognize the key role of Wikipedia botsExpand
The Falklands/Malvinas war taken to the Wikipedia realm: a multimodal discourse analysis of cross-lingual violations of the Neutral Point of View
Wikipedia is a multilingual collaborative, user-generated encyclopaedia. As the largest source of free knowledge on the Internet, Wikipedia is at the crossroads of diverse cultural and nationalExpand
Wikiproject Tropical Cyclones: The most successful crowd-sourced knowledge project with near real-time coverage of extreme weather phenomena
Abstract We present the results of our research on Wikiproject Tropical Cyclones, and on the readership of articles about hurricanes and cyclones that this Wikiproject curates. According to ourExpand
Reflections on a Life in Science and STS
In popular histories, science is commonly presented as engaging in a struggle against organised religion. The story of Galileo, forced by church authorities to recant his views, is endlessly retold...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 31 REFERENCES
Is Wikipedia Biased
This study empirically examines whether Wikipedia has a neutral point of view. It develops a method for measuring the slant of 28 thousand articles about US politics. In its earliest years,Expand
The work of sustaining order in wikipedia: the banning of a vandal
TLDR
This paper analyzes "vandal fighting" as an epistemic process of distributed cognition, highlighting the role of non-human actors in enabling a decentralized activity of collective intelligence in Wikipedia. Expand
Critical point of view: a Wikipedia reader
As part of the CPOV project with the Institute of Network Cultures, we published a Wikipedia reader titled Critical Point of View. The Reader is edited by Geert Lovink and Nathaniel Tkacz. TheExpand
Beyond vandalism: Wikipedia trolls
TLDR
It is concluded that Wikipedia trolls are one type of hacker, and boredom, attention seeking, and revenge motivate trolls; they regard Wikipedia as an entertainment venue, and find pleasure from causing damage to the community and other people. Expand
Wikipedia and the Politics of Openness
Few virtues are as celebrated in contemporary culture as openness. Rooted in software culture and carrying more than a whiff of Silicon Valley technical utopianism, openness—of decision-making, data,Expand
Dynamics of Conflicts in Wikipedia
TLDR
This work builds up samples of controversial and peaceful articles and analyze the temporal characteristics of the activity in these samples, and identifies three distinct developmental patterns for the overall behavior of the articles. Expand
The Streisand Effect and Censorship Backfire
Barbra Streisand’s attempt to restrict online views of her residence on a public website had the paradoxical effect of leading to many more views than if she had done nothing. Subsequently, attemptsExpand
Common Knowledge?: An Ethnography of Wikipedia
With an emphasis on peer-produced content and collaboration, Wikipedia exemplifies a departure from traditional management and organizational models. This iconic "project" has been variouslyExpand
Public relations interactions with Wikipedia
Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to consider the relevance of the institutional analysis and development (IAD) framework (Ostrom, 1990) in understanding the incentives for public relations (PR)Expand
On the Suppression of Vaccination Dissent
  • B. Martin
  • Psychology, Medicine
  • Sci. Eng. Ethics
  • 2015
TLDR
Three types of cases are examined: scientists and physicians; a high-profile researcher; and a citizen campaigner, which provides a preliminary framework for understanding the dynamics of suppression in terms of vulnerabilities. Expand
...
1
2
3
4
...