Percutaneous versus surgical tracheostomy: A randomized controlled study with long-term follow-up*

@article{Silvester2006PercutaneousVS,
  title={Percutaneous versus surgical tracheostomy: A randomized controlled study with long-term follow-up*},
  author={William Silvester and Donna Goldsmith and Shigehiko Uchino and Rinaldo Bellomo and Simon R. Knight and Siven Seevanayagam and Danny J. Brazzale and M. Mcmahon and Jonathan Buckmaster and Graeme Kevin Hart and Helen Ingrid Opdam and Robert J. Pierce and Geoffrey A Gutteridge},
  journal={Critical Care Medicine},
  year={2006},
  volume={34},
  pages={2145-2152}
}
Objective:To compare the safety, availability, and long-term sequelae of percutaneous vs. surgical tracheostomy. Design:Prospective, randomized, controlled study. Setting:Combined medical/surgical intensive care unit in a tertiary referral hospital. Patients:Two hundred critically ill mechanically ventilated patients who required tracheostomy. Interventions:Tracheostomy by either percutaneous tracheostomy or surgical tracheostomy performed in the intensive care unit. Measurements and Main… 
Comparison of Percutaneous Dilatational Tracheostomy with Open Tracheostomy in Intensive Care Unit
TLDR
Percutaneous dilatational trachostomy is simple, faster to perform and can be done at bedside to avoid considerable delay in the performance of open tracheostomy where there is high demand for elective and emergency procedures in operating room.
Percutaneous versus open tracheostomy: comparison of procedures and surgical site infections.
TLDR
To the authors' knowledge, this is the largest study of the benefit of percutaneous tracheostomy in a critically injured trauma population and the risk of SSI is significantly lower after per cutaneous than open trachostomy.
Two-Year Follow-Up After Percutaneous Dilatational Tracheostomy in a Surgical ICU
TLDR
An observational cohort study investigating long-term outcome parameters of percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy in critically ill patients at the interdisciplinary ICU at the University of Leipzig, finding decannulations after PDT are easily done.
Comparative study between percutaneous dilatation tracheostomy and surgical tracheostomy
TLDR
PDT is a safe and reliable method for tracheostomy in all ICU cases and is associated with lower incidence of postoperative complications in terms of bleeding and stomal infection, and no statistically significant difference was found in the incidence of stenosis.
Percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy versus surgical tracheostomy in critically ill patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis
TLDR
PDT reduces the overall incidence of wound infection and may further reduce clinical relevant bleeding and mortality when compared with ST performed in the operating theatre, and should be considered the procedure of choice for performing elective tracheostomies in critically ill adult patients.
Long-Term Outcome Following Tracheostomy in Critical Care: A Systematic Review*
TLDR
Considering comparative data, there was no significant difference in the prevalence of tracheal stenosis or major bleeding between percutaneous and surgical tracheostomy and in relation to wound infection, a reduction associated with the original Ciaglia technique when compared with that with the surgical trachostomy.
Long term outcomes following percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy in the critically ill
TLDR
All surgical and percutaneous techniques are broadly similar in terms of early and late complications, and the reported complication rates presented within a cohort study may indicate that the STD PDT is one of the safer techniques available.
Prospective observational study of postoperative complications after percutaneous dilatational or surgical tracheostomy in critically ill patients.
TLDR
In a large heterogeneous group of critically ill patients, single dilator PDT was safe and had few postoperative complications, and those who underwent PDT were more likely to receive a larger-sized tracheostomy tube and less likely to experience obstruction or displacement of the postoperative tracheOSTomy tube.
7-Year Survey After Percutaneous Dilatational Tracheotomy on a Medical Intensive Care Unit
  • P. Lebiedz, A. Suca, +4 authors H. Reinecke
  • Medicine
    Journal of investigative medicine : the official publication of the American Federation for Clinical Research
  • 2010
TLDR
Percutaneous dilatational tracheotomy is an easily performed, cost-saving method for long-term ventilated patients with a low rate of acute and long- term complications even in old and multimorbid internal medicine patients.
...
1
2
3
4
5
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 41 REFERENCES
Surgical tracheostomy versus percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy. A prospective-randomized study with long-term follow-up.
TLDR
This study confirms that PDT is a simpler and quicker procedure than ST and that it has a lower rate of early postoperative complications and further investigations of long-term outcome following PDT are therefore necessary.
Percutaneous versus surgical tracheostomy: a double-blind randomized trial.
TLDR
There were more minor perioperative complications with PcT and more minor long term complications with SgT, and both techniques are associated with a low rate of serious or intermediate complications when performed by experienced surgeons.
Comparative clinical trial of standard operative tracheostomy with percutaneous tracheostomy
TLDR
Percutaneous tracheostomy appeared to be superior to the conventional operation in patients with respiratory failure, and their complications tended to be more serious.
A prospective, randomized study comparing percutaneous with surgical tracheostomy in critically ill patients
TLDR
PDT is a cost-effective alternative to ST and the reduction in patient charges associated with PDT in this study resulted from the procedure being performed in the intensive care unit, thus eliminating the need for operating room facilities and personnel.
The long-term complications of percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy.
TLDR
It is suggested that percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy is a safe, cost-effective alternative to standard tracheOSTomy in critically ill patients.
Late outcome of percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy in intensive care patients
TLDR
Late outcome of percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy in critically ill patients is mostly good and the use of this technique in intensive care units appears justified.
A meta-analysis of prospective trials comparing percutaneous and surgical tracheostomy in critically ill patients.
TLDR
Findings support PDT as the procedure of choice for the establishment of elective tracheostomy in the appropriately selected critically ill patient, including ease of performance, and lower incidence of peristomal bleeding and postoperative infection.
Percutaneous tracheostomy: Prospective comparison of the translaryngeal technique versus the forceps-dilational technique in 100 critically ill adults
TLDR
On the basis of the results, it is concluded that the forceps-dilation technique is superior to the translaryngeal technique, with fewer technical difficulties and fewer complications for critically ill patients.
Percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy versus conventional surgical tracheostomy. A clinical randomised study.
TLDR
The results indicate that the percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy technique performed with the Ciaglia Introducer Set is effective, safe and superior to conventional surgical trachostomy as immediate complications as well as complications with the trachestomy tube in situ are fewer and of less severity.
Percutaneous dilational tracheostomy or conventional surgical tracheostomy?
TLDR
The cost of PDT was significantly lower than the cost of ST (p < .001), and it was found that PDT is a cost‐effective procedure in critically ill ICU patients.
...
1
2
3
4
5
...