Percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass graft for unprotected left main coronary artery disease: the endless debate.

@article{Meliga2008PercutaneousCI,
  title={Percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass graft for unprotected left main coronary artery disease: the endless debate.},
  author={E. Meliga and M. Valgimigli and P. Buszman and P. Serruys},
  journal={Journal of the American College of Cardiology},
  year={2008},
  volume={52 7},
  pages={
          582-4; author reply 584-6
        }
}
The “state-of-the art” paper written by Taggart et al. ([1][1]) calls into question the current evidence in support of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for the treatment of unprotected left main stem disease. In view of the fact that current guidelines still indicate coronary artery 
8 Citations
The DELFT (Drug Eluting stent for LeFT main) registry: the unknowns.
  • D. Taggart
  • Medicine
  • Journal of the American College of Cardiology
  • 2008
  • 7

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 28 REFERENCES
Revascularization for unprotected left main stem coronary artery stenosis stenting or surgery.
  • 169
  • PDF
Acute and late outcomes of unprotected left main stenting in comparison with surgical revascularization.
  • 370
  • PDF
Systematic Review: The Comparative Effectiveness of Percutaneous Coronary Interventions and Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery
  • 337
  • PDF
Spectrum of surgical risk for left main coronary stenoses: benchmark for potentially competing percutaneous therapies.
  • 81
Off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery for critical left main stem disease: safety, efficacy and outcome.
  • 91
  • PDF
...
1
2
3
...