Corpus ID: 145715909

Perceptions of Academic Honesty in Online vs. Face-to-Face Classrooms

@article{Spaulding2009PerceptionsOA,
  title={Perceptions of Academic Honesty in Online vs. Face-to-Face Classrooms},
  author={Michael Spaulding},
  journal={Journal of Interactive Online Learning},
  year={2009},
  volume={8},
  pages={183-198}
}
As online instruction continues to evolve, instructors continue to struggle with the perceived growing problem of academic dishonesty. This study will expand the literature regarding academic integrity, particularly in the online learning environment by examining student perceptions of academic integrity related to both online and face-to-face course formats. A survey was administered which measured the frequency students participated in academic misconduct and the instances in which students… Expand

Tables from this paper

The effect of an online academic integrity tutorial on student perceptions of cheating
Many college faculty members expect more cheating to occur in online classes than in face-to-face courses. This opinion stems from the belief that it is easier for students to cheat when material isExpand
Students' Perception and Behavior of Academic Integrity: A Case Study of a Writing Forum Activity.
The use of online tools such as forum has helped instructors develop courses that are engaging and challenging. However, instructors want to ensure that all students maintain academic integrity whenExpand
Supporting Academic Honesty in Online Courses.
Patricia McGee The University of Texas at San Antonio Abstract Ensuring academic honesty is a challenge for traditional classrooms, but more so for online course where technology use is axiomatic toExpand
Exploring community college students' and faculty members' perceptions on academic dishonesty
Academic dishonesty is a well-documented problem in higher education. While numerous actions and/or behaviors are attributed to threatening academic integrity, the vernacular term used by bothExpand
Cultural Influences on Academic Sharing
The purpose of this chapter is to examine student perspectives on academic sharing, in both online and face-to-face higher educational settings, focusing on generational and cross-nationalExpand
Am I Cheating? An Analysis of Online Students' Perceptions of Their Behaviors and Attitudes
Even 100 years ago, academic dishonesty was an issue of concern to educators at American universities and colleges and the beginnings of honor systems were introduced (New York Times, 1915). StudentsExpand
Promoting a Culture of Integrity: A Study of Faculty and Student Perceptions of Academic Dishonesty at a Large Public Midwestern University.
Research reveals that reducing academic misconduct requires an understanding of factors that influence the two key stakeholders in the epidemic: students who engage in academically dishonestExpand
Examining the Effect of Proctoring on Online Test Scores.
TLDR
Compared online test results from proctored versus unproctored online tests, significant grade disparity and different time usage occurred on different exams, both across and within sections of the same course where some students used test proctoring software and others did not. Expand
Examining Online Cheating in Higher Education Using Traditional Classroom Cheating as a Guide
Academic dishonesty in higher education is a perverse problem affecting institutions of learning in many countries across the globe. More alarmingly, numerous studies have pointed to increasing ratesExpand
A global vision
TLDR
The findings of this study suggest that the peer review process is helpful for experienced online instructors but not for instructors who are new to online teaching, and should include a face-to-face orientation for peer dyads and a worksheet that contains open-ended questions and is adaptable to changing technology and a variety of disciplines. Expand
...
1
2
3
4
5
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 34 REFERENCES
Academic Honesty and Online Courses
Academic dishonesty is an issue of concern for teachers, students, and institutions of higher education. Because students and faculty do not interact directly in web-based classes, it is oftenExpand
Faculty Perception on Student Academic Honesty
This study intends to investigate possible differences in student and faculty perception on student academic honesty and also proposes to detect possible differences in student variables such as yearExpand
Academic Dishonesty at the Graduate Level
We investigated the definition, prevalence, perceived prevalence and severity of, as well as justifications for and expected responses to, academic dishonesty at the graduate level in a sample of 246Expand
Academic Integrity as an Institutional Issue
Academic dishonesty among students is not confined to the dynamics of the classrooms in which it occurs. The institution has a major role in fostering academic integrity. Ways that institutions canExpand
Cheating in Online Student Assessment: Beyond Plagiarism
Online student assessment features in many distance-learning programs. The prevention of plagiarism has been subject of much attention, but insufficient attention has been given to other problems ofExpand
Development of an Academic Honesty Policy: A Case Study in Collaboration with Faculty
Developmentally Speaking Collaboration between faculty and student affairs professionals is a priority in this new millennium. Because of the increased complexity and tremendous changes occurring atExpand
Academic dishonesty and distance learning: Student and faculty views.
Cheating is a major concern on many college campuses. For example, Davis, Grover, Becker, and McGregor (1992) reported that between 40% and 60% of their student respondents reported cheating on atExpand
Cheating in Academic Institutions: A Decade of Research
This article reviews 1 decade of research on cheating in academic institutions. This research demonstrates that cheating is prevalent and that some forms of cheating have increased dramatically inExpand
College Student Cheating: The Role of Motivation, Perceived Norms, Attitudes, and Knowledge of Institutional Policy
Cheaters and noncheaters were assessed on 2 types of motivation (mastery and extrinsic), on perceived social norms regarding cheating, on attitudes about cheating, and on knowledge of institutionalExpand
Guilty in whose eyes? University students' perceptions of cheating and plagiarism in academic work and assessment
ABSTRACT The little published work on cheating and plagiarism amongst students in higher education has, almost without exception, used questionnaire techniques which take for granted a sharedExpand
...
1
2
3
4
...