Penile implant infection prevention part II: device coatings have changed the game
@article{Mulcahy2020PenileII, title={Penile implant infection prevention part II: device coatings have changed the game}, author={J. Mulcahy and T. K{\"o}hler and Lexiaochuan Wen and S. Wilson}, journal={International Journal of Impotence Research}, year={2020}, pages={1 - 7} }
The single most important factor in the reduction of penile implant infections has been the infection retardant coatings. Virtually every inflatable penile prosthesis (IPP) sold for the last 15 years in America has been coated and the device infection rate has dropped over 50% to less than 1% in experienced implanter practices. The vast majority of penile implants are contaminated with bacteria at time of surgery and the bacteria live within the implant spaces in a quiescent fashion protected… CONTINUE READING
References
SHOWING 1-10 OF 34 REFERENCES
Biofilm and penile prosthesis infections in the era of coated implants: a review.
- Medicine
- The journal of sexual medicine
- 2012
- 65
A Surgeon's Guide to the Various Antibiotic Dips Available During Penile Prosthesis Implantation
- Medicine
- Current Urology Reports
- 2019
- 12
Penile prosthesis cultures during revision surgery: a multicenter study.
- Medicine
- The Journal of urology
- 2004
- 106
- PDF
Anti-infection dip suggestions for the Coloplast Titan Inflatable Penile Prosthesis in the era of the infection retardant coated implant.
- Chemistry, Medicine
- The journal of sexual medicine
- 2011
- 26
Biofilm formation on clinically noninfected penile prostheses.
- Medicine
- The Journal of urology
- 2006
- 61
- PDF
Inflatable penile implant infection: predisposing factors and treatment suggestions.
- Medicine
- The Journal of urology
- 1995
- 214