Penalties for success: reactions to women who succeed at male gender-typed tasks.

  title={Penalties for success: reactions to women who succeed at male gender-typed tasks.},
  author={Madeline E. Heilman and Aaron S. Wallen and Daniel Fuchs and Melinda M. Tamkins},
  journal={The Journal of applied psychology},
  volume={89 3},
A total of 242 subjects participated in 3 experimental studies investigating reactions to a woman's success in a male gender-typed job. Results strongly supported the authors' hypotheses, indicating that (a) when women are acknowledged to have been successful, they are less liked and more personally derogated than equivalently successful men (Studies 1 and 2); (b) these negative reactions occur only when the success is in an arena that is distinctly male in character (Study 2); and (c) being… 

Tables from this paper

Wimpy and undeserving of respect: Penalties for men's gender-inconsistent success
No credit where credit is due: attributional rationalization of women's success in male-female teams.
Unless the ambiguity about individual contribution to the dyad's successful joint outcome was constrained by providing feedback about individual team member performance, female members were devalued-they were rated as being less competent, less influential, and less likely to have played a leadership role in work on the task.
Why are women penalized for success at male tasks?: the implied communality deficit.
Results indicated that the negativity directed at successful female managers--in ratings of likability, interpersonal hostility, and boss desirability--was mitigated when there was indication that they were communal.
The Power of Language: Gender, Status, and Agency in Performance Evaluations
In the workplace, women often encounter gender stereotypes and biases that reinforce the existing gender hierarchy, may hinder women’s career aspirations and retention, and may limit their ability to
A Crisis of Competence: Benevolent Sexism Affects Evaluations of Women’s Competence
People higher in benevolent sexism often outwardly endorse gender equality, but support men over women for challenging positions and experiences. Reflecting shifting standards (a tendency to evaluate
Differential Support for Female Supervisors Among Men and Women
A pattern consistent with gender in-group favoritism and inconsistent with lay beliefs that women respond negatively to women in authority positions is found.
Why Can’t a Woman Fail Like a Man? Gender Differences in Perceived Competence Following a Mistake
Stereotypes are pervasive and can significantly influence the way we perceive and evaluate others. When people occupy roles that are not congruent with stereotypes (such as a stay-at-home dad or a
It Had to Be You (Not Me)!
It is demonstrated that women devalue their contributions to collaborative work, and that they do so by engaging in attributional rationalization, a process sparked by women’s negative performance expectations and facilitated by source ambiguity and a satisfactory “other” to whom to allocate credit.
When Accomplishments Come Back to Haunt You: The Negative Effect of Competence Signals on Women's Performance Evaluations
This research explores the possibility that the very accomplishments that are critical to success during the hiring process (e.g., educational attainment, promotion history) can lead to a drop in
Men Should Be Competent, Women Should Have it All: Multiple Criteria in the Evaluation of Female Job Candidates
The present research investigated whether evaluations of female and male job candidates rely on different dimensions. Going beyond previous studies on the role of gender stereotypes, we examined the


Speech style, gender stereotypes, and corporate success: What if women talk more like men?
This study tests competing socialization- and identity-based hypotheses concerning the impact of variations in speech style (powerful/powerless) on perceptions of male and female managerial job
Self-promotion as a risk factor for women: the costs and benefits of counterstereotypical impression management.
  • L. Rudman
  • Psychology
    Journal of personality and social psychology
  • 1998
Three experiments tested and extended recent theory regarding motivational influences on impression formation in the context of an impression management dilemma that women face: Self-promotion may be instrumental for managing a competent impression, yet women who self-promote may suffer social reprisals for violating gender prescriptions to be modest.
Discrimination Against Competent Women1
Although women have complained about job discrimination, the experimental literature has revealed little discrimination against competent women. On the thesis that discrimination would only occur
Prescriptive Gender Stereotypes and Backlash Toward Agentic Women
In an experiment, job description and applicants' attributes were examined as moderators of the backlash effect, the negative evaluation of agentic women for violating prescriptions of feminine
Are Men Sexually Harassed? If So, by Whom?
The results indicate that men experience potentially sexually harassing behaviors from other men at least as often as they do from women; however, men in all samples reported relatively few negative reactions to these experiences.
Sex Effects on Evaluation
Prejudicial evaluation is often cited as an explanation for the apparent failure of competent women to achieve as much success as men have. In this paper we review research on the evaluation of the
Are Women More Likely to Be Hired or Promoted into Management Positions
Abstract The research examined the likelihood that, relative to men, women would more often attain management positions due to promotion versus hiring. Financial services managers ( n = 30,996) were
Feminized management and backlash toward agentic women: the hidden costs to women of a kinder, gentler image of middle managers.
Women must present themselves as agentic to be hireable, but may therefore be seen as interpersonally deficient, and Ironically, the feminization of management may legitimize discrimination against competent, agentic women.
Are Women Evaluated More Favorably Than Men?: An Analysis of Attitudes, Beliefs, and Emotions
In an experiment in which male and female respondents evaluated the social category of women or men on several types of measures, analysis of respondents' attitudes toward the sexes and of the
The sexual harassment of men: Evidence for a broader theory of sexual harassment and sex discrimination.
The article imposes a social science framework on a law-based theory of sexual harassment forwarded by Katherine Franke (1997), which sought to address shortcomings of extant theory and to account