Peer review of grant applications: a harbinger for mediocrity in clinical research?

@article{Horrobin1996PeerRO,
  title={Peer review of grant applications: a harbinger for mediocrity in clinical research?},
  author={David Frederick Horrobin},
  journal={The Lancet},
  year={1996},
  volume={348},
  pages={1293-1295}
}

Research Funding in Open Science

The advent of the Open Science paradigm has led to new interdependencies between the funding of research and the practice of Open Science. On the one hand, traditional revenue models in Science

The Economics of Economists: Academic rankings between the “republic of science” and “new public management”

Academic rankings mediate between the differing goals of the “republic of science” and of “new public management”. Nevertheless, rankings recently have come under scrutiny. We discuss the advantages

Academic Rankings between the “Republic of Science” and “New Public Management”

Academic rankings mediate between the differing goals of the “republic of science” and of “new public management”. Nevertheless, rankings recently have come under scrutiny. We discuss the advantages

Shifting Power Relations and the Ethics of Journal Peer Review

Peer review of manuscripts has recently become a subject of academic research and ethical debate. Critics of the review process argue that it is a means by which powerful members of the scientific

Academic Rankings and Research Governance

Academic rankings today are the backbone of research governance, which seem to fit the aims of “new public management” on the one side and the idea of the “republic of science” on the other side.

xxxxxxxAcademic Rankings and Research Governance

Academic rankings today are the backbone of research governance, which seem to fit the aims of “new public management” on the one side and the idea of the “republic of science” on the other side.

Peer review and over-competitive research funding fostering mainstream opinion to monopoly

A model of “peer-group-assessed-grant-based-funding-system” combined with tenure system and over-competitive research funding review process is proposed, the first on the quantitatively investigation which dramatizes the current short-comings of the process.

Research Governance in Academia: Are There Alternatives to Academic Rankings?

Peer reviews and rankings today are the backbone of research governance, but recently came under scrutiny. They take explicitly or implicitly agency theory as a theoretical basis. The emerging

The ‘Quality Myth’: Promoting and Hindering Conditions for Acquiring Research Funds

Research funding has been undergoing a shift from recurrent, stable funding to competitive funding of projects. The system rests on the assumption that the best proposals or the best researchers
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 14 REFERENCES

The philosophical basis of peer review and the suppression of innovation.

The fundamental purpose of peer review in the biomedical sciences must be consistent with that of medicine itself, to cure sometimes, to relieve often, to comfort always.

Letter: Experience gained in vocational training in obstetrics.

In rodents glucose appears to enhance the toxic effects of fenfluramine, which suggests that it is unlikely to have a therapeutic role in severe intoxication in humans, and its efficacy in the long term remains somewhat dubious.

Priorities in research.

  • A. Sabin
  • Political Science, Medicine
    Science
  • 1993

Reviewing applied-research grant proposals: can we learn from medical journals?

  • C. Naylor
  • Computer Science, Medicine
    CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne
  • 1994

The grants game

Discovery and Invention

Dr. Lampitt has uttered a much needed warning against the tendency to assume the validity of such results and the adequacy of an experimental technique without any rigorous verification of its suitability for the particular purpose in mind.

Essential fatty acid metabolism in boys with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder.

The present study found that 53 subjects with ADHD had significantly lower concentrations of key fatty acids in the plasma polar lipids and in red blood cell total lipids than did the 43 control subjects.