Peer review as a strategy for improving students’ writing process

  title={Peer review as a strategy for improving students’ writing process},
  author={Kimberly M. Baker},
  journal={Active Learning in Higher Education},
  pages={179 - 192}
Peer review is an established strategy for improving the quality of students’ writing. This study moves beyond the focus on outcomes to assess the peer-review process. In particular, this study focuses on the timing of the peer review, a highly structured feedback form, and student writers’ revisions after engaging in peer review. This study draws from a peer-review assignment conducted over 3 years in upper-division, discipline-specific courses. The data reveal these strategies force students… 

Figures and Tables from this paper

The Effect of Online Peer Review Activities on Students’ Academic Writing Performance
Peer review activities have been conducted in writing classes and have shown good impacts on the students’ writing skills. The purpose of this study is to examine the effects of online peer review
Benefits of Peer Review on Students’ Writing
Writing has long been recognized as both an outcome and method of successful pedagogy in psychology. Accordingly, there are a number of methods that successful instructors have employed to teach
Promoted Peer Review in EFL Writing: Development in Students’ Perceptions and Feedback
While many studies have examined the impact of peer review on EFL students’ perceptions of peer review and acceptance and incorporation of feedback in their writing with the help of training or
Addressing the “My Students Cannot Write” Dilemma: Investigating Methods for Improving Graduate Student Writing
  • Rebecca M. Achen
  • Education
    Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning
  • 2018
Improved writing can help students in their academic and professional careers, thus this action research project examined the use of three revision strategies in a graduate course by collecting three
Reflection on peer reviewing as a pedagogical tool in higher education
Previous research has emphasized both the importance of giving and receiving peer feedback for the purpose of active learning, as well as of university students’ engagement in reflection to improve
Investigating the Effectiveness of Web-Based Peer Review in Students’ Drafts Revision: A Critical EAP Perspective
Previous research on peer review considered it as a strategy of improving students’ writing (Baker, 2016; Hu, 2005). To investigate its effectiveness, this research has established a small corpus
The Correlation between Online Peer Review and Academic Writing Students’ Learning Styles
Peer review studies have been done for years. It has been found that by having these activities, learners will get benefits from the communication with the peer who can give them input to improve
Supporting argumentative essay writing through an online supported peer-review script
ABSTRACT This study investigated the impact of an online peer-review script on students’ argumentative peer-review quality and argumentative essay writing. A pre- and post-test experimental design
How Timing and Authority in Peer Review Impact STEM Students: A Comparative Assessment of Writing and Critical Thinking in Kinesiology Courses
This comparative, mixed-methods study illustrates the impact of weekly facilitated peer review (“Writing Circles”) in STEM courses across time: 1) in a lowerdivision course, Circles improve all
Peer Review and Reflection in Engineering Labs: Writing to Learn and Learn- ing to Write
Clear communication of complex technical concepts vexes both undergraduate engineering students and professors who often throw up their hands exclaiming, “Why can’t students write?” Instead of


Using Peer Review to Improve Student Writing in Business Courses
The author discusses using student peer review in business classes to improve students' final written submissions and discusses the definition of peer review, the benefits and reasons peer review helps improve student writing, the common peer review methods, the ways to incorporate peer review into business courses, and the disadvantages ofpeer review.
The student view on online peer reviews
Investigating how students perceive the process, content and effects of peer reviews in a computer science course on scientific writing indicates that students value the peer review activity, take peer reviews seriously and provide comprehensive and constructive reviews.
Facilitating improved writing among students through directed peer review
The results suggest that the face-to-face peer review did improve the quality of a business communication assignment and implies a number of essential instructional practices toward improved writing and collaboration.
The effects of trained peer review on EFL students’ revision types and writing quality
Enhancing Critical Reading and Writing through Peer Reviews: An Exploration of Assisted Performance.
Using a Web-based, conferencing system, we required students to electronically post draft answers to take-home essay questions. Students then produced peer reviews of each other's answers. Regression
Peer feedback: the learning element of peer assessment
This paper focuses on peer feedback in relation to assessment processes. It examines the rationale for peer feedback, emphasizing its potential for enhanced student learning. We draw on relevant
Student Peer Review in the Classroom: A Teaching and Grading Tool.
It is helpful for instructors to provide students with critique, not only upon completion of a writing assignment but also during the writing process. However, due to time constraints, instructors
The Consistency of Peer Review in Student Writing Projects
Examination of the peer evaluation process undertaken by 60 undergraduate students to determine whether students are consistent graders for both total scores and selected disaggregate evaluation criteria concludes that students are able to grade papers efficiently and consistently.
The Effect of Peer and Teacher Feedback on Student Writing