Peer review and fraud

@article{2006PeerRA,
  title={Peer review and fraud},
  author={},
  journal={Nature},
  year={2006},
  volume={444},
  pages={971-972}
}
  • Published 2006
  • Medicine
  • Nature
Two assessments of the refereeing process highlight challenges for journals. 
Emerging trends in peer review—a survey
‘No comment’? A study of commenting on PLOS articles
Secondary observer effects: idiosyncratic errors in small-N secondary data analysis
...
1
2
...